Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Run PolicyAutomation tests separately in CI #489

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 1, 2023

Conversation

JustinKuli
Copy link
Contributor

The PolicyAutomation tests were taking about half of the total e2e test duration. This excludes those tests from the usual make e2e-test target, which will accelerate both the CI and local development. Those tests are now run in a separate (concurrent) GH job in the CI workflow, and the test coverage information is merged in another new job.

This also combines the unit tests and linting tasks into one job, which means that a linting or formatting error will not prevent the e2e tests from running.

Refs:

Signed-off-by: Justin Kulikauskas [email protected]
(cherry picked from commit db0c8dd)

Closes #488

The PolicyAutomation tests were taking about half of the total e2e test
duration. This excludes those tests from the usual `make e2e-test`
target, which will accelerate both the CI and local development. Those
tests are now run in a separate (concurrent) GH job in the CI workflow,
and the test coverage information is merged in another new job.

This also combines the unit tests and linting tasks into one job, which
means that a linting or formatting error will not prevent the e2e tests
from running.

Refs:
 - https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ACM-8239

Signed-off-by: Justin Kulikauskas <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit db0c8dd)
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 1, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: JustinKuli, yiraeChristineKim

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [JustinKuli,yiraeChristineKim]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot merged commit 8cecebe into stolostron:main Nov 1, 2023
14 checks passed
@JustinKuli JustinKuli deleted the sync-ocm-143 branch November 1, 2023 16:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

😿 Failed to sync the upstream PRs: #143
2 participants