more spectral extraction improvements for downstream use

[kecnry]

Description

This pull request implements several more generalizations/improvements so that spectral extraction can be inherited downstream (in lcviz in spacetelescope/lcviz#115 and possibly in rampviz in the future).

These are very minor changes - would it be unreasonable to consider this for the next bugfix release? Shouldn't affect jdaviz configs directly, so probably doesn't need a changelog?

Change log entry

• Is a change log needed? If yes, is it added to CHANGES.rst? If you want to avoid merge conflicts,
  list the proposed change log here for review and add to CHANGES.rst before merge. If no, maintainer
  should add a no-changelog-entry-needed label.

Checklist for package maintainer(s)

This checklist is meant to remind the package maintainer(s) who will review this pull request of some common things to look for. This list is not exhaustive.

• Are two approvals required? Branch protection rule does not check for the second approval. If a second approval is not necessary, please apply the trivial label.
• Do the proposed changes actually accomplish desired goals? Also manually run the affected example notebooks, if necessary.
• Do the proposed changes follow the STScI Style Guides?
• Are tests added/updated as required? If so, do they follow the STScI Style Guides?
• Are docs added/updated as required? If so, do they follow the STScI Style Guides?
• Did the CI pass? If not, are the failures related?
• Is a milestone set? Set this to bugfix milestone if this is a bug fix and needs to be released ASAP; otherwise, set this to the next major release milestone. Bugfix milestone also needs an accompanying backport label.
• After merge, any internal documentations need updating (e.g., JIRA, Innerspace)?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 87.60%. Comparing base (a334d2e) to head (56c0e18).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3227      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   87.60%   87.60%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         128      128              
  Lines       19856    19856              
==========================================
- Hits        17395    17394       -1     
- Misses       2461     2462       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[pllim]

Huh, extra </plugin-select>? Is this a bug?

[kecnry]

nope, I replaced it above (line 212) with /> and moved the j-docs-link into its own row so that it looks better when the plugin is wide.

[pllim]

Looks uncontroversial enough. Thanks!