[server] Add host-level signals for adaptive ingestion throttler #4000
sixpluszeroVeniceCI-StaticAnalysisAndUnitTests.yml
on: pull_request
Matrix: Clients / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Controller / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Integrations / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Internal / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Router / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Server / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: StaticAnalysis
ValidateGradleWrapper
7s
StaticAnalysisAndUnitTestsCompletionCheck
0s
Annotations
26 errors and 21 warnings
|
SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(
<any long>
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:492)
However, there were exactly 33 interactions with this mock:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
2.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1966)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.004899d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:753)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1607)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1966)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.003326d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:753)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1607)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1966)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.003036d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:753)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1607)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.094716d,
1737015959515L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1274)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1279)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.050995d,
1737015959516L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1274)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1279)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2587)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1966)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.002735d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:753)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1607)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.054963d,
1737015959527L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1274)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1279)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.Stor
|
|
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testProcessConsumerActionsError:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportError(
<any string>,
1,
<Capturing argument>
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.reportError(StoreIngestionTask.java:4284)
However, there were exactly 30 interactions with this mock:
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(
TestTopic_597738d6e9_86cbb6f5_v1-1
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.runTest(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:886)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(
TestTopic_597738d6e9_86cbb6f5_v1-1,
true
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:616)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:630)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:577)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4117)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.nextSeqNum();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:639)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.run();
-> at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:539)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1628)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4117)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(
Mock for Store, hashCode: 1429422227
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1630)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isHybridMode();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(StoreIngestionTask.java:1547)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(
Mock for Store, hashCode: 1429422227
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1631)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(
KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_597738d6e9_86cbb6f5_v1-1, attempts=2, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1737015944594},
Mock for Store, hashCode: 1429422227
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1920)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(
KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_597738d6e9_86cbb6f5_v1-1, attempts=2, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1737015944594}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:569)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportIfCatchUpVersionTopicOffset(
PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_597738d6e9_86cbb6f5_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestIgnoredUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestRTOffsetTriedToProduceToVTMap{}, offsetRecord=OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=-1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}, errorReported=false, started=false, lagCaughtUp=false, processedRecordSizeSinceLastSync=0, leaderFollowerState=STANDBY}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(StoreIngestionTask.java:2165)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateLeaderTopicOnFollower(
PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_597738d6e9_86cbb6f5_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1,
|
|
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(
<any long>
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:492)
However, there were exactly 30 interactions with this mock:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
12.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1966)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.003226d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:753)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1607)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1966)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.001432d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:753)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1607)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.09662000000000001d,
1737015946400L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1274)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1279)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.055794d,
1737015946401L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1274)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1279)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1966)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.001092d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:753)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1607)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2587)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.044813d,
1737015946412L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1274)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1279)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2587)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2587)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1966)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.001383d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngesti
|
|
SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(
<any long>
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:492)
However, there were exactly 33 interactions with this mock:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
2.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1966)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.004899d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:753)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1607)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1966)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.003326d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:753)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1607)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1966)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.003036d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:753)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1607)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.094716d,
1737015959515L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1274)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1279)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.050995d,
1737015959516L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1274)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1279)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2587)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1966)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.002735d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:753)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1607)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.054963d,
1737015959527L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1274)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1279)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.Stor
|
|
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testProcessConsumerActionsError:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportError(
<any string>,
1,
<Capturing argument>
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.reportError(StoreIngestionTask.java:4284)
However, there were exactly 30 interactions with this mock:
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(
TestTopic_597738d6e9_86cbb6f5_v1-1
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.runTest(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:886)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(
TestTopic_597738d6e9_86cbb6f5_v1-1,
true
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:616)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:630)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:577)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4117)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.nextSeqNum();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:639)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.run();
-> at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:539)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1628)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4117)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(
Mock for Store, hashCode: 1429422227
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1630)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isHybridMode();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(StoreIngestionTask.java:1547)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(
Mock for Store, hashCode: 1429422227
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1631)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(
KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_597738d6e9_86cbb6f5_v1-1, attempts=2, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1737015944594},
Mock for Store, hashCode: 1429422227
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1920)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(
KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_597738d6e9_86cbb6f5_v1-1, attempts=2, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1737015944594}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:569)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportIfCatchUpVersionTopicOffset(
PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_597738d6e9_86cbb6f5_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestIgnoredUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestRTOffsetTriedToProduceToVTMap{}, offsetRecord=OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=-1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}, errorReported=false, started=false, lagCaughtUp=false, processedRecordSizeSinceLastSync=0, leaderFollowerState=STANDBY}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(StoreIngestionTask.java:2165)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateLeaderTopicOnFollower(
PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_597738d6e9_86cbb6f5_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1,
|
|
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(
<any long>
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:492)
However, there were exactly 30 interactions with this mock:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
12.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1966)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.003226d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:753)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1607)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1966)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.001432d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:753)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1607)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.09662000000000001d,
1737015946400L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1274)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1279)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.055794d,
1737015946401L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1274)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1279)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1966)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.001092d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:753)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1607)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2587)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.044813d,
1737015946412L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1274)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1279)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2587)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2587)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1966)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.001383d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngesti
|
|
Server / UT & CodeCov (17)
Process completed with exit code 1.
|
|
Server / UT & CodeCov (8)
Process completed with exit code 1.
|
|
SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testNotifier[1](AA_OFF):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.ArgumentsAreDifferent: Argument(s) are different! Wanted:
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_5c11581982_168a8fa8_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.lambda$testNotifier$35(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:1623)
Actual invocations have different arguments:
storageMetadataService.getLastOffset(
"TestTopic_5c11581982_168a8fa8_v1",
1
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49)
storageMetadataService.getLastOffset(
"TestTopic_5c11581982_168a8fa8_v1",
2
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_5c11581982_168a8fa8_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$708/383995908@2c47190f
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_5c11581982_168a8fa8_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1737015943489, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_5c11581982_168a8fa8_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1737015943489, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_5c11581982_168a8fa8_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$708/383995908@3f6700f9
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_5c11581982_168a8fa8_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$708/383995908@11c7a488
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_5c11581982_168a8fa8_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1737015943489, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_5c11581982_168a8fa8_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1737015943489, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_5c11581982_168a8fa8_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$708/383995908@6b78d078
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_5c11581982_168a8fa8_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1737015943489, la
|
|
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testNotifier[1](AA_OFF):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.ArgumentsAreDifferent: Argument(s) are different! Wanted:
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_5afb5c3bd7_353d027_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.lambda$testNotifier$35(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:1621)
Actual invocations have different arguments:
storageMetadataService.getLastOffset(
"TestTopic_5afb5c3bd7_353d027_v1",
1
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49)
storageMetadataService.getLastOffset(
"TestTopic_5afb5c3bd7_353d027_v1",
2
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_5afb5c3bd7_353d027_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$722/85276854@4e861faf
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_5afb5c3bd7_353d027_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$722/85276854@1b942e3a
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_5afb5c3bd7_353d027_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1737015938823, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_5afb5c3bd7_353d027_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1737015938823, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_5afb5c3bd7_353d027_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1737015938824, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_5afb5c3bd7_353d027_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$722/85276854@1ed4dd17
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_5afb5c3bd7_353d027_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1737015938824, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_5afb5c3bd7_353d027_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$722/85276854@11a0d0e3
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_5afb5c3bd7_353d027_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1737015938824, latestProducerProc
|
|
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testNotifier[1](AA_OFF):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.ArgumentsAreDifferent: Argument(s) are different! Wanted:
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_72b536aff3_1cfead40_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.lambda$testNotifier$35(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:1623)
Actual invocations have different arguments:
storageMetadataService.getLastOffset(
"TestTopic_72b536aff3_1cfead40_v1",
1
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49)
storageMetadataService.getLastOffset(
"TestTopic_72b536aff3_1cfead40_v1",
2
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_72b536aff3_1cfead40_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$267/456034161@79dc05c7
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_72b536aff3_1cfead40_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$267/456034161@1b102770
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_72b536aff3_1cfead40_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1737016040754, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_72b536aff3_1cfead40_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1737016040754, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_72b536aff3_1cfead40_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1737016040754, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_72b536aff3_1cfead40_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1737016040754, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_72b536aff3_1cfead40_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$267/456034161@7f81e922
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_72b536aff3_1cfead40_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$267/456034161@7194cf53
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_72b536aff3_1cfead40_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1737016040755, la
|
|
NativeMetadataRepositoryTest.testNativeMetadataRepositoryStats:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/repository/NativeMetadataRepositoryTest.java#L133
java.lang.AssertionError: expected [2000.0] but found [1000.0]
|
|
SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testNotifier[1](AA_OFF):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.ArgumentsAreDifferent: Argument(s) are different! Wanted:
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_5c11581982_168a8fa8_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.lambda$testNotifier$35(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:1623)
Actual invocations have different arguments:
storageMetadataService.getLastOffset(
"TestTopic_5c11581982_168a8fa8_v1",
1
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49)
storageMetadataService.getLastOffset(
"TestTopic_5c11581982_168a8fa8_v1",
2
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_5c11581982_168a8fa8_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$708/383995908@2c47190f
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_5c11581982_168a8fa8_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1737015943489, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_5c11581982_168a8fa8_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1737015943489, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_5c11581982_168a8fa8_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$708/383995908@3f6700f9
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_5c11581982_168a8fa8_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$708/383995908@11c7a488
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_5c11581982_168a8fa8_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1737015943489, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_5c11581982_168a8fa8_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1737015943489, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_5c11581982_168a8fa8_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$708/383995908@6b78d078
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_5c11581982_168a8fa8_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1737015943489, la
|
|
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testNotifier[1](AA_OFF):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.ArgumentsAreDifferent: Argument(s) are different! Wanted:
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_5afb5c3bd7_353d027_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.lambda$testNotifier$35(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:1621)
Actual invocations have different arguments:
storageMetadataService.getLastOffset(
"TestTopic_5afb5c3bd7_353d027_v1",
1
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49)
storageMetadataService.getLastOffset(
"TestTopic_5afb5c3bd7_353d027_v1",
2
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_5afb5c3bd7_353d027_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$722/85276854@4e861faf
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_5afb5c3bd7_353d027_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$722/85276854@1b942e3a
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_5afb5c3bd7_353d027_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1737015938823, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_5afb5c3bd7_353d027_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1737015938823, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_5afb5c3bd7_353d027_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1737015938824, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_5afb5c3bd7_353d027_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$722/85276854@1ed4dd17
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_5afb5c3bd7_353d027_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1737015938824, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_5afb5c3bd7_353d027_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$722/85276854@11a0d0e3
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_5afb5c3bd7_353d027_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1737015938824, latestProducerProc
|
|
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testNotifier[1](AA_OFF):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.ArgumentsAreDifferent: Argument(s) are different! Wanted:
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_72b536aff3_1cfead40_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.lambda$testNotifier$35(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:1623)
Actual invocations have different arguments:
storageMetadataService.getLastOffset(
"TestTopic_72b536aff3_1cfead40_v1",
1
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49)
storageMetadataService.getLastOffset(
"TestTopic_72b536aff3_1cfead40_v1",
2
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_72b536aff3_1cfead40_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$267/456034161@79dc05c7
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_72b536aff3_1cfead40_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$267/456034161@1b102770
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_72b536aff3_1cfead40_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1737016040754, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_72b536aff3_1cfead40_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1737016040754, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_72b536aff3_1cfead40_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1737016040754, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_72b536aff3_1cfead40_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1737016040754, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_72b536aff3_1cfead40_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$267/456034161@7f81e922
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_72b536aff3_1cfead40_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$267/456034161@7194cf53
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_72b536aff3_1cfead40_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1737016040755, la
|
|
NativeMetadataRepositoryTest.testNativeMetadataRepositoryStats:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/repository/NativeMetadataRepositoryTest.java#L133
java.lang.AssertionError: expected [2000.0] but found [1000.0]
|
|
SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testNotifier[1](AA_OFF):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.ArgumentsAreDifferent: Argument(s) are different! Wanted:
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_596147a7bc_9f781cd9_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.lambda$testNotifier$35(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:1623)
Actual invocations have different arguments:
storageMetadataService.getLastOffset(
"TestTopic_596147a7bc_9f781cd9_v1",
1
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49)
storageMetadataService.getLastOffset(
"TestTopic_596147a7bc_9f781cd9_v1",
2
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_596147a7bc_9f781cd9_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$740/0x00000008007b5c40@3fb57f06
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_596147a7bc_9f781cd9_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1737015940112, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_596147a7bc_9f781cd9_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1737015940112, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_596147a7bc_9f781cd9_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$740/0x00000008007b5c40@3248981e
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_596147a7bc_9f781cd9_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1737015940112, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_596147a7bc_9f781cd9_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1737015940112, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_596147a7bc_9f781cd9_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$740/0x00000008007b5c40@358cc3a1
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_596147a7bc_9f781cd9_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$740/0x00000008007b5c40@43f22566
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_596147a7bc_9f781cd9_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807
|
|
SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testNotifier[1](AA_OFF):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.ArgumentsAreDifferent: Argument(s) are different! Wanted:
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_7a3dd91ea7_8082ed2d_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.lambda$testNotifier$35(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:1623)
Actual invocations have different arguments:
storageMetadataService.getLastOffset(
"TestTopic_7a3dd91ea7_8082ed2d_v1",
1
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49)
storageMetadataService.getLastOffset(
"TestTopic_7a3dd91ea7_8082ed2d_v1",
2
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_7a3dd91ea7_8082ed2d_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$534/0x00000008006a5440@49622b0
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_7a3dd91ea7_8082ed2d_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1737016081253, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_7a3dd91ea7_8082ed2d_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1737016081254, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_7a3dd91ea7_8082ed2d_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$534/0x00000008006a5440@125e529e
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_7a3dd91ea7_8082ed2d_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$534/0x00000008006a5440@31785843
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_7a3dd91ea7_8082ed2d_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1737016081254, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_7a3dd91ea7_8082ed2d_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1737016081253, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_7a3dd91ea7_8082ed2d_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1737016081254, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_7a3dd91ea7_8082ed2d_v1",
|
|
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testProcessConsumerActionsError:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportError(
<any string>,
1,
<Capturing argument>
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.reportError(StoreIngestionTask.java:4284)
However, there were exactly 173 interactions with this mock:
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(
TestTopic_612d314103_18eba7d1_v1-1
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.runTest(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:886)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(
TestTopic_612d314103_18eba7d1_v1-1,
true
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:616)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:630)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:577)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4117)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.nextSeqNum();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:639)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.run();
-> at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:515)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1628)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4117)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(
Mock for Store, hashCode: 1592794352
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1630)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isHybridMode();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(StoreIngestionTask.java:1547)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(
Mock for Store, hashCode: 1592794352
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1631)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(
KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_612d314103_18eba7d1_v1-1, attempts=2, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1737015973655},
Mock for Store, hashCode: 1592794352
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1920)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(
KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_612d314103_18eba7d1_v1-1, attempts=2, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1737015973655}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:569)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportIfCatchUpVersionTopicOffset(
PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_612d314103_18eba7d1_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestIgnoredUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestRTOffsetTriedToProduceToVTMap{}, offsetRecord=OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=-1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}, errorReported=false, started=false, lagCaughtUp=false, processedRecordSizeSinceLastSync=0, leaderFollowerState=STANDBY}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(StoreIngestionTask.java:2165)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateLeaderTopicOnFollower(
PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_612d314103_18eba7d1_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1
|
|
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(
<any long>
);
Wanted 2 times:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:492)
But was 1 time:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2595)
|
|
SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testNotifier[1](AA_OFF):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.ArgumentsAreDifferent: Argument(s) are different! Wanted:
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_596147a7bc_9f781cd9_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.lambda$testNotifier$35(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:1623)
Actual invocations have different arguments:
storageMetadataService.getLastOffset(
"TestTopic_596147a7bc_9f781cd9_v1",
1
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49)
storageMetadataService.getLastOffset(
"TestTopic_596147a7bc_9f781cd9_v1",
2
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_596147a7bc_9f781cd9_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$740/0x00000008007b5c40@3fb57f06
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_596147a7bc_9f781cd9_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1737015940112, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_596147a7bc_9f781cd9_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1737015940112, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_596147a7bc_9f781cd9_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$740/0x00000008007b5c40@3248981e
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_596147a7bc_9f781cd9_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1737015940112, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_596147a7bc_9f781cd9_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1737015940112, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_596147a7bc_9f781cd9_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$740/0x00000008007b5c40@358cc3a1
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_596147a7bc_9f781cd9_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$740/0x00000008007b5c40@43f22566
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_596147a7bc_9f781cd9_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807
|
|
SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testNotifier[1](AA_OFF):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.ArgumentsAreDifferent: Argument(s) are different! Wanted:
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_7a3dd91ea7_8082ed2d_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.lambda$testNotifier$35(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:1623)
Actual invocations have different arguments:
storageMetadataService.getLastOffset(
"TestTopic_7a3dd91ea7_8082ed2d_v1",
1
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49)
storageMetadataService.getLastOffset(
"TestTopic_7a3dd91ea7_8082ed2d_v1",
2
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_7a3dd91ea7_8082ed2d_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$534/0x00000008006a5440@49622b0
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_7a3dd91ea7_8082ed2d_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1737016081253, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_7a3dd91ea7_8082ed2d_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1737016081254, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_7a3dd91ea7_8082ed2d_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$534/0x00000008006a5440@125e529e
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_7a3dd91ea7_8082ed2d_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$534/0x00000008006a5440@31785843
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_7a3dd91ea7_8082ed2d_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1737016081254, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_7a3dd91ea7_8082ed2d_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1737016081253, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_7a3dd91ea7_8082ed2d_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1737016081254, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_7a3dd91ea7_8082ed2d_v1",
|
|
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testProcessConsumerActionsError:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportError(
<any string>,
1,
<Capturing argument>
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.reportError(StoreIngestionTask.java:4284)
However, there were exactly 173 interactions with this mock:
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(
TestTopic_612d314103_18eba7d1_v1-1
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.runTest(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:886)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(
TestTopic_612d314103_18eba7d1_v1-1,
true
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:616)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:630)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:577)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4117)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.nextSeqNum();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:639)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.run();
-> at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:515)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1628)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4117)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(
Mock for Store, hashCode: 1592794352
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1630)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isHybridMode();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(StoreIngestionTask.java:1547)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(
Mock for Store, hashCode: 1592794352
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1631)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(
KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_612d314103_18eba7d1_v1-1, attempts=2, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1737015973655},
Mock for Store, hashCode: 1592794352
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1920)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(
KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_612d314103_18eba7d1_v1-1, attempts=2, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1737015973655}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:569)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportIfCatchUpVersionTopicOffset(
PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_612d314103_18eba7d1_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestIgnoredUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestRTOffsetTriedToProduceToVTMap{}, offsetRecord=OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=-1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}, errorReported=false, started=false, lagCaughtUp=false, processedRecordSizeSinceLastSync=0, leaderFollowerState=STANDBY}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(StoreIngestionTask.java:2165)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateLeaderTopicOnFollower(
PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_612d314103_18eba7d1_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1
|
|
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(
<any long>
);
Wanted 2 times:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:492)
But was 1 time:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2595)
|
|
Server / UT & CodeCov (11)
Process completed with exit code 1.
|
|
StaticAnalysisAndUnitTestsCompletionCheck
Process completed with exit code 1.
|
|
ValidateGradleWrapper
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Integrations / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Integrations / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Integrations / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Controller / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Controller / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Controller / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
StaticAnalysis (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Router / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Router / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Router / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Internal / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Internal / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Internal / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Server / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Server / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Server / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Clients / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Clients / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Clients / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
StaticAnalysisAndUnitTestsCompletionCheck
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
Artifacts
Produced during runtime
| Name | Size | |
|---|---|---|
|
StaticAnalysis
|
650 KB |
|
|
clients-jdk11
|
2.55 MB |
|
|
clients-jdk17
|
2.57 MB |
|
|
clients-jdk8
|
2.51 MB |
|
|
controller-jdk11
|
1.45 MB |
|
|
controller-jdk17
|
1.45 MB |
|
|
controller-jdk8
|
1.44 MB |
|
|
integrations-jdk11
|
531 KB |
|
|
integrations-jdk17
|
535 KB |
|
|
integrations-jdk8
|
518 KB |
|
|
internal-jdk11
|
3.24 MB |
|
|
internal-jdk17
|
3.25 MB |
|
|
internal-jdk8
|
3.23 MB |
|
|
router-jdk11
|
1.04 MB |
|
|
router-jdk17
|
1.04 MB |
|
|
router-jdk8
|
1.03 MB |
|
|
server-jdk11
|
9.19 MB |
|
|
server-jdk17
|
9.2 MB |
|
|
server-jdk8
|
9.34 MB |
|