Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ENGDOCS-1717 #18446

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Oct 26, 2023
Merged

ENGDOCS-1717 #18446

merged 14 commits into from
Oct 26, 2023

Conversation

aevesdocker
Copy link
Contributor

Proposed changes

Related issues (optional)

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 17, 2023

Deploy Preview for docsdocker ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 02f6108
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/docsdocker/deploys/653a401c9a53ac0008bdc186
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-18446--docsdocker.netlify.app/desktop/synchronized-file-sharing
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

content/desktop/synchronized-file-sharing.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
content/desktop/synchronized-file-sharing.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Some example of things you might want to add to your `.syncignore` file are:
- ?

In general, the contents of your `.syncignore` file should be similar to what you have in your `.gitignore` file.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure if this is an ideal heuristic for describing the .syncignore contents. There are some fairly significant semantic differences between .dockerignore/.syncignore and .gitignore ignore syntaxes, so I wouldn't want users to copy/paste and expect it to work. Less importantly: the content ignored during the inner loop may not align entirely with what goes into .gitignore. Maybe we could just add a caveat about the syntactic differences... I'm not sure the best way to approach it.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've adjusted this sentence to reflect your comment above. I actually think this is fine for now, we can revisit this post-EAP and monitor if users need extra clarification

content/desktop/synchronized-file-sharing.md Show resolved Hide resolved
content/desktop/synchronized-file-sharing.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
content/desktop/synchronized-file-sharing.md Show resolved Hide resolved
content/desktop/synchronized-file-sharing.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
content/desktop/synchronized-file-sharing.md Show resolved Hide resolved
content/desktop/synchronized-file-sharing.md Show resolved Hide resolved

- Upon launching Docker Desktop, it can take between 5-10 seconds for Synchronized file sharing to fully initialize. During this window, file share instances display as **Connecting** and any new containers created during this window won't replace bind mounts with Synchronized file sharing.

- `.syncignore` changes won't cause deletion until file share recreation. In other words, files that become ignored due to a modification to `.syncignore` are left in place, but no longer update through synchronization.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"..changes won't cause deletion.." Do we mean the files are not deleted? Wondering if we can rephrase it

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: Should we hyphenate re-creation for clarity

@aevesdocker aevesdocker added this to the DD 4.25 milestone Oct 26, 2023
Copy link
Member

@usha-mandya usha-mandya left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@aevesdocker aevesdocker merged commit 270c2ef into docker:main Oct 26, 2023
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants