-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
adds DPRS, SPSW and TDSW #224
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could the DPRS description change to ' differential pressure sensor' instead of 'differential pressure switch'?
@RitaLav these are two different physical things (switch = boolean, sensor = analog value) do we add both? |
Sensor and switch can both be added with separate abbreviations. DPRSW (actuator - differential pressure switch) already exists in the register (so we don't need to add another one), the sensor does not. |
one more comment added to issue #223 which concludes all abbreviations requested |
all comments addressed - resolves #223 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We believe the switches should be best classified as switches (since you note on the issue that have normally open and closed states.
Therefore changes as follows (first item remains unchanged)
sensor - differential pressure sensor,DPRS,SENSOR,IfcSensor,PRESSURESENSOR
actuator - pressure switch,PRSW, ,IfcActuator,NOTDEFINED
actuator - static pressure switch, ,IfcActuator,NOTDEFINED
actuator - thermal dispersion flow proving switch,TDSW, ,IfcActuator,NOTDEFINED
Is that a correct interpretation?
hi Rita, I don't feel any of those should be classed as an actuator. An actuator would normally be an output device, not an input. I would say DPRSW is wrong - maybe added as a sensor for an actuator? but a differential pressure switch itself is a input/sensor. |
hi - to my logic: actuators / switches provide fundamentally the same function but are for mechanical / electrical action respectively. I agree with @blip2 that this is in wrong:
then if we add the other switches i'd suggest: |
Thank you @blip2 @jgunstone Conclusion: Will add: We will also need to amend the existing dew point switch abbreviation from 'DPSW' to 'DEWSW' and modify its ifc class to IfcSwitchingDevice |
f3da1ab
to
db469a3
Compare
DPSW (previosuly dew point switch) is now DEWSW
db469a3
to
da4733b
Compare
rebased due to major changes in master branch. should be good to go now. |
Thank you @blip2 - all done |
added additional sensors as per #223