Fix GWCS failures due to the API spring cleaning PR

[WilliamJamieson]

The PR spacetelescope/gwcs#457, cleans up and firms the GWCS API to match what is claimed by GWCS. This PR resolves the failures caused by these changes by correctly calling the GWCS API.

Tasks

• request a review from someone specific, to avoid making the maintainers review every PR
• add a build milestone, i.e. Build 11.3 (use the latest build if not sure)
• Does this PR change user-facing code / API? (if not, label with no-changelog-entry-needed)
  • write news fragment(s) in changes/: echo "changed something" > changes/<PR#>.<changetype>.rst (see below for change types)
  • update or add relevant tests
  • update relevant docstrings and / or docs/ page
  • start a regression test and include a link to the running job (click here for instructions)
    • Do truth files need to be updated ("okified")?
      • after the reviewer has approved these changes, run okify_regtests to update the truth files
• if a JIRA ticket exists, make sure it is resolved properly

news fragment change types...

• changes/<PR#>.general.rst: infrastructure or miscellaneous change
• changes/<PR#>.docs.rst
• changes/<PR#>.stpipe.rst
• changes/<PR#>.datamodels.rst
• changes/<PR#>.scripts.rst
• changes/<PR#>.fits_generator.rst
• changes/<PR#>.set_telescope_pointing.rst
• changes/<PR#>.pipeline.rst

stage 1

• changes/<PR#>.group_scale.rst
• changes/<PR#>.dq_init.rst
• changes/<PR#>.emicorr.rst
• changes/<PR#>.saturation.rst
• changes/<PR#>.ipc.rst
• changes/<PR#>.firstframe.rst
• changes/<PR#>.lastframe.rst
• changes/<PR#>.reset.rst
• changes/<PR#>.superbias.rst
• changes/<PR#>.refpix.rst
• changes/<PR#>.linearity.rst
• changes/<PR#>.rscd.rst
• changes/<PR#>.persistence.rst
• changes/<PR#>.dark_current.rst
• changes/<PR#>.charge_migration.rst
• changes/<PR#>.jump.rst
• changes/<PR#>.clean_flicker_noise.rst
• changes/<PR#>.ramp_fitting.rst
• changes/<PR#>.gain_scale.rst

stage 2

• changes/<PR#>.assign_wcs.rst
• changes/<PR#>.badpix_selfcal.rst
• changes/<PR#>.msaflagopen.rst
• changes/<PR#>.nsclean.rst
• changes/<PR#>.imprint.rst
• changes/<PR#>.background.rst
• changes/<PR#>.extract_2d.rst
• changes/<PR#>.master_background.rst
• changes/<PR#>.wavecorr.rst
• changes/<PR#>.srctype.rst
• changes/<PR#>.straylight.rst
• changes/<PR#>.wfss_contam.rst
• changes/<PR#>.flatfield.rst
• changes/<PR#>.fringe.rst
• changes/<PR#>.pathloss.rst
• changes/<PR#>.barshadow.rst
• changes/<PR#>.photom.rst
• changes/<PR#>.pixel_replace.rst
• changes/<PR#>.resample_spec.rst
• changes/<PR#>.residual_fringe.rst
• changes/<PR#>.cube_build.rst
• changes/<PR#>.extract_1d.rst
• changes/<PR#>.resample.rst

stage 3

• changes/<PR#>.assign_mtwcs.rst
• changes/<PR#>.mrs_imatch.rst
• changes/<PR#>.tweakreg.rst
• changes/<PR#>.skymatch.rst
• changes/<PR#>.exp_to_source.rst
• changes/<PR#>.outlier_detection.rst
• changes/<PR#>.tso_photometry.rst
• changes/<PR#>.stack_refs.rst
• changes/<PR#>.align_refs.rst
• changes/<PR#>.klip.rst
• changes/<PR#>.spectral_leak.rst
• changes/<PR#>.source_catalog.rst
• changes/<PR#>.combine_1d.rst
• changes/<PR#>.ami.rst

other

• changes/<PR#>.wfs_combine.rst
• changes/<PR#>.white_light.rst
• changes/<PR#>.cube_skymatch.rst
• changes/<PR#>.engdb_tools.rst
• changes/<PR#>.guider_cds.rst

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 76.90%. Comparing base (e82bac9) to head (560b171).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8965   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   76.90%   76.90%           
=======================================
  Files         498      498           
  Lines       45769    45771    +2     
=======================================
+ Hits        35199    35201    +2     
  Misses      10570    10570           

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
nightly	77.39% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️	Carriedforward from e82bac9

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[melanieclarke]

@nden - does this change need to go in 11.2?

[nden]

I believe in this case frame.coordinates should return a list of SkyCoord and SpectralCoord. If it doesn't this may be an issue with the "spring cleaning" PR. I'll review it after the inverse bbox is fixed.

[WilliamJamieson]

That's not the issue. frame.coordinates has been removed because it was doing misleading things.

[nden]

LGTM

[tapastro]

Running a fresh set of RTs before we merge: https://github.com/spacetelescope/RegressionTests/actions/runs/12602731599

[tapastro]

Why was this merged before the tests completed?

[nden]

Sorry, miscommunication. We can revert if tests fail.