-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.7k
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Merge branch 'rebase-txt2kg' of https://github.com/pyg-team/pytorch_g…
…eometric into rebase-txt2kg
- Loading branch information
Showing
1 changed file
with
4 additions
and
4 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ | ||
# Examples for LLM and GNN co-training | ||
|
||
| Example | Description | | ||
| ---------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | ||
| [`benchmark_model_archs_rag.py`](./benchmark_model_archs_rag.py) | Script for running a GNN/LLM benchmark on GRetriever while grid searching relevent architecture parameters and datasets. | | ||
| [`minimal_demo.py`](./minimal_demo.py) | Minimal demo for WebQSP dataset comparing GNN+LLM vs LLM | | ||
| Example | Description | | ||
| ---------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | | ||
| [`benchmark_model_archs_rag.py`](./benchmark_model_archs_rag.py) | Script for running a GNN/LLM benchmark on GRetriever while grid searching relevent architecture parameters and datasets. | | ||
| [`minimal_demo.py`](./minimal_demo.py) | Minimal demo for WebQSP dataset comparing GNN+LLM vs LLM | | ||
|
||
NOTE: Evaluating performance on GRetriever with smaller sample sizes may result in subpar performance. It is not unusual for the fine-tuned model/LLM to perform worse than an untrained LLM on very small sample sizes. |