[CI] Switch to codecov

[surchs]

• Related Switch to Codecov and increase threshold for failed code coverage checks planning#173

Changes proposed in this pull request:

Checklist

This section is for the PR reviewer

• PR has an interpretable title with a prefix ([ENH], [FIX], [REF], [TST], [CI], [MNT], [INF], [MODEL], [DOC]) (see our Contributing Guidelines for more info)
• PR has a label for the release changelog or skip-release (to be applied by maintainers only)
• PR links to GitHub issue with mention Closes #XXXX
• Tests pass
• Checks pass
• If the PR changes the SPARQL query template, the default Neurobagel query file has also been regenerated

For new features:

• Tests have been added

For bug fixes:

• There is at least one test that would fail under the original bug conditions.

Summary by Sourcery

CI:

• Switch from Coveralls to Codecov for code coverage reporting in the CI workflow.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This PR switches the code coverage reporting service from Coveralls to Codecov. The implementation involves updating the GitHub Actions workflow file to remove Coveralls integration and add Codecov integration.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Replace Coveralls with Codecov for code coverage reporting	Remove workflow_dispatch trigger from GitHub Actions workflow Remove Coveralls GitHub Action and its configuration Add Codecov upload action with token configuration Remove explicit coverage report generation steps	.github/workflows/test.yaml

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
  this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @surchs - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

• The PR removes the test execution and coverage generation steps. These need to be retained before the Codecov upload - otherwise there won't be any coverage data to report.

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟢 General issues: all looks good
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[codecov]

Welcome to Codecov 🎉

Once you merge this PR into your default branch, you're all set! Codecov will compare coverage reports and display results in all future pull requests.

Thanks for integrating Codecov - We've got you covered ☂️

[alyssadai]

Two 🍒, otherwise🧑‍🍳!

[alyssadai]

Also, as in the other PR - how about the [CI] PR label instead? :)