Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: Removed class, added polars to the table, str.head and str.tail are a… #1801

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

marvinl803
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this? (check all applicable)

  • πŸ’Ύ Refactor
  • ✨ Feature
  • πŸ› Bug Fix
  • πŸ”§ Optimization
  • [ X] πŸ“ Documentation
  • βœ… Test
  • 🐳 Other

Related issues

Checklist

  • [ X] Code follows style guide (ruff)
  • Tests added
  • Documented the changes

If you have comments or can explain your changes, please do so below

I removed the class column from the api-completeness table. Also added polars to the tables and marked Expr.str.head / Expr.str.tail as checked. If there is any issues or corrections needed please let me know, thank you!

Copy link
Member

@FBruzzesi FBruzzesi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @marvinl803 thanks for your contribution! I left a comment regarding the inclusion of polars in the tables :)

@@ -49,12 +49,15 @@ class Backend(NamedTuple):
Backend(name="duckdb", module="_duckdb", type_=BackendType.LAZY),
Backend(name="pandas-like", module="_pandas_like", type_=BackendType.EAGER),
Backend(name="spark-like", module="_spark_like", type_=BackendType.LAZY),
Backend(name="polars", module="_polars", type_=BackendType.EAGER),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I assume you are referring to #1789 comment. However, this would not render as expected since our polars implementation mostly call polars methods dynamically. Since we follow a subset of the polars API, everything should be flagged as green for a potential polars column in each table.

@marvinl803
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey @marvinl803 thanks for your contribution! I left a comment regarding the inclusion of polars in the tables :)

Thank you, I'll take a look at it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

docs: remove class name from api completeness table, remove Expr.str.head / Expr.str.tail
2 participants