Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix generate_combinations issue with Linux Qt 6.7 #756

Merged

Conversation

ddalcino
Copy link
Contributor

Fix issues discovered in #751. See #751 (comment)

Qt 6.7.0 changes the default arch for Linux from gcc_64 to linux_gcc_64. This allows the generate_combinations.py script to account for that.

Also, Qt 6.7.0 is missing a few architectures that were present in earlier versions of Qt6. This makes sure that the script can pick those up.

Qt 6.7.0 changes the default arch for Linux from gcc_64 to linux_gcc_64.
This allows the generate_combinations.py script to account for that.

Also, Qt 6.7.0 is missing a few architectures that were present in
earlier versions of Qt6. This makes sure that the script can pick those
up.
@ddalcino
Copy link
Contributor Author

Shouldn't CI for this PR actually run the generate_combinations.py script, or did we not set it up to do that?

New version of black formats metadata.py differently than before
@miurahr miurahr merged commit 4994594 into miurahr:master Feb 10, 2024
17 checks passed
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ def iter_arches() -> Generator[dict, None, None]:
logger.info("Fetching arches")
archive_ids = list(iter_archive_ids(category="qt"))
for archive_id in tqdm(archive_ids):
for version in ("latest", "5.15.2", "5.13.2", "5.9.9"):
for version in ("latest", "6.5", "6.2", "5.15.2", "5.13.2", "5.9.9"):
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oops; this doesn't actually work because 6.5 and 6.2 are not valid versions. I was counting on CI to fail if the script doesn't work; I didn't realize it wasn't going to run.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants