Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WEB-3066] refactor: replace Space Services with Services Package #6353

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 11, 2025

Conversation

prateekshourya29
Copy link
Member

@prateekshourya29 prateekshourya29 commented Jan 8, 2025

Description

In this PR, I have replaced all the space application (sites.plane.so) services with service package

Type of Change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Improvement (change that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Code refactoring
  • Performance improvements
  • Documentation update

References

WEB-3066

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Introduced new services for enhanced API interactions:
      • Authentication (SitesAuthService)
      • Cycles (SitesCycleService)
      • Files (SitesFileService)
      • Issues (SitesIssueService)
      • Labels (SitesLabelService)
      • Members (SitesMemberService)
      • Modules (SitesModuleService)
      • Projects (SitesProjectPublishService)
      • States (SitesStateService)
      • User profiles (SitesUserService)
  • Improvements

    • Streamlined service methods with consistent naming conventions.
    • Enhanced type safety with new type definitions (e.g., TPublicCycle, TIssuePublicComment).
    • Centralized service imports from @plane/services.
  • Changes

    • Replaced legacy service implementations with site-specific services.
    • Updated method signatures and error handling across various services.
    • Removed obsolete service classes.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling in service methods.
    • Enhanced type definitions for better type checking.
  • Technical Debt

    • Refactored service architecture for clarity and maintainability.
    • Consolidated import paths for consistency.
    • Simplified service method interfaces for easier usage.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 8, 2025

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces a comprehensive refactoring of service classes across the Plane application, focusing on creating specialized "Sites" services for different domains like authentication, issues, files, cycles, and more. The changes centralize service implementations, improve type safety, and standardize method naming conventions. The refactoring involves removing existing service classes, introducing new site-specific services, and updating import paths and method calls throughout the application.

Changes

File/Module Change Summary
packages/services/ Added new site-specific services for auth, issues, files, cycles, labels, modules, members, states, and project publishing
packages/types/ Introduced new types like TPublicCycle, TIssuePublicComment, TPublicModule, TPublicMember to support new service implementations
space/core/services/ Removed existing service classes like APIService, AuthService, IssueService, etc.
space/core/store/ Updated stores to use new site-specific services and methods
Import Paths Consolidated imports to use @plane/services and @plane/types

Possibly Related PRs

Suggested Reviewers

  • SatishGandham
  • rahulramesha

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's Ode to Service Refactoring 🐰
In services old, chaos did dwell,
But now our code rings clear as a bell!
Site-specific magic, types so bright,
Refactoring brought our system's delight!
Hop, hop, hooray for clean design! 🎉


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d919125 and df19913.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/types/src/issues/issue_reaction.d.ts (1 hunks)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 11

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
space/core/store/module.store.ts (1)

Line range hint 58-67: Fix incorrect error message in catch block

The error message refers to "members" instead of "modules".

-      console.error("Failed to fetch members:", error);
+      console.error("Failed to fetch modules:", error);
🧹 Nitpick comments (26)
space/core/store/profile.store.ts (1)

Line range hint 118-133: Consider enhancing error handling in the catch block.

While the method name change to updateProfile is good, the error handling could be improved:

  1. Add proper error typing instead of using a generic error
  2. Consider logging the error for debugging purposes
  3. The error message could be more specific based on the actual error

Here's a suggested improvement:

-    } catch (error) {
+    } catch (error: unknown) {
+      console.error("Failed to update user profile:", error);
       if (currentUserProfileData) {
         Object.keys(currentUserProfileData).forEach((key: string) => {
           const userKey: keyof TUserProfile = key as keyof TUserProfile;
           if (this.data) set(this.data, userKey, currentUserProfileData[userKey]);
         });
       }
       runInAction(() => {
         this.error = {
           status: "user-profile-update-error",
-          message: "Failed to update user profile",
+          message: error instanceof Error ? error.message : "Failed to update user profile",
         };
       });
     }
packages/services/src/file/sites-file.service.ts (3)

24-27: Bind methods after calling super() in the constructor

Accessing this before calling super() can lead to errors in TypeScript classes. It's recommended to call super() before using this.

Apply this diff to rearrange the constructor:

 constructor(BASE_URL?: string) {
+  super(BASE_URL || API_BASE_URL);
   this.cancelUpload = this.cancelUpload.bind(this);
   // services
   this.fileUploadService = new FileUploadService();
-  super(BASE_URL || API_BASE_URL);
 }

Line range hint 37-44: Refactor repetitive error handling into a helper method

The error handling in the catch blocks is repetitive across multiple methods. Refactoring this into a private helper method will improve maintainability and reduce code duplication.

Add a private method to handle errors:

private handleError(error: any): never {
  throw error?.response?.data || error.message;
}

Then, update the catch blocks in your methods:

 .catch((error) => {
-  throw error?.response?.data;
+  this.handleError(error);
 });

Also applies to: 57-65, 83-91, 103-111


70-75: Add type safety to method parameters and return types

The uploadAsset method accepts data: TFileEntityInfo, but the fileMetaData is spread into this object without explicit type checking. Ensure that the combined data conforms to the expected request payload structure.

Consider defining a specific type for the request payload and ensure all properties are accounted for.

packages/services/src/issue/sites-issue.service.ts (3)

11-11: Clarify the documentation remark for proper capitalization

The remark in the class documentation refers to "plane sites." If "Plane Sites" is a specific term or product name, it should be capitalized correctly.

Consider updating the remark:

 * @remarks This service is only available for plane sites
+* @remarks This service is only available for Plane sites.

25-244: Enhance type safety by defining specific types

Many methods use any for parameters and return types, which reduces type safety and can lead to runtime errors. Define specific interfaces or types for request parameters (data) and responses to improve code reliability.

For example, define types like IVoteData, IReactionData, ICommentData, and use them in method signatures:

async addVote(anchor: string, issueID: string, data: IVoteData): Promise<IVoteResponse> { /* ... */ }

Similarly, replace Promise<any> with more specific types reflecting the expected response data.


30-32: Improve error handling for clearer error messages

Currently, the catch blocks throw error?.response, which may not contain meaningful information. Update the error handling to throw the most informative error message possible.

Apply this diff to adjust the error handling:

 .catch((error) => {
-  throw error?.response;
+  throw error?.response?.data || error.message;
});

Alternatively, create a private method to handle errors consistently:

private handleError(error: any): never {
  throw error?.response?.data || error.message;
}

And use it in your catch blocks:

.catch((error) => this.handleError(error));

Also applies to: 45-47, 60-62, 75-77, 90-92, 105-107, 121-123, 136-138, 151-153, 168-170, 185-187, 200-202, 222-224, 238-240

packages/services/src/user/index.ts (1)

1-3: Consider maintaining alphabetical order for exports.

While the export statement is correct, consider reordering the exports alphabetically for better maintainability:

 export * from "./favorite.service";
+export * from "./sites-member.service";
 export * from "./user.service";
-export * from "./sites-member.service";
packages/services/src/module/index.ts (1)

1-4: Consider maintaining alphabetical order for exports.

While the export statement is correct, consider reordering the exports alphabetically for better maintainability:

 export * from "./link.service";
 export * from "./module.service";
 export * from "./operations.service";
-export * from "./sites-module.service";
+export * from "./sites-module.service";
packages/services/src/cycle/index.ts (1)

Line range hint 1-5: Consider maintaining alphabetical order for exports.

While the export statement is correct, consider reordering the exports alphabetically for better maintainability:

 export * from "./cycle-analytics.service";
 export * from "./cycle-archive.service";
 export * from "./cycle-operations.service";
 export * from "./cycle.service";
-export * from "./sites-cycle.service";
+export * from "./sites-cycle.service";
packages/services/src/index.ts (1)

13-16: Consider maintaining alphabetical order for exports

The new exports should be integrated into the existing alphabetical order for better maintainability and easier navigation.

 export * from "./dashboard";
+export * from "./file";
 export * from "./instance";
 export * from "./intake";
+export * from "./issue";
+export * from "./label";
 export * from "./module";
 export * from "./project";
+export * from "./state";
 export * from "./user";
 export * from "./workspace";
-export * from "./file";
-export * from "./label";
-export * from "./state";
-export * from "./issue";
packages/services/src/state/sites-state.service.ts (2)

24-30: Enhance error handling robustness

The error handling could be more robust by handling cases where error.response might be undefined.

   async list(anchor: string): Promise<IState[]> {
     return this.get(`/api/public/anchor/${anchor}/states/`)
       .then((response) => response?.data)
       .catch((error) => {
-        throw error?.response?.data;
+        throw error?.response?.data || error?.message || 'Failed to fetch states';
       });
   }

7-12: Enhance documentation with @SInCE tag

Consider adding a @SInCE tag to indicate when this class was introduced.

 /**
  * Service class for managing states within plane sites application.
  * Extends APIService to handle HTTP requests to the state-related endpoints.
  * @extends {APIService}
  * @remarks This service is only available for plane sites
+ * @since 1.0.0
  */
packages/services/src/label/sites-label.service.ts (1)

24-30: Add type safety to error handling and response validation

The error and response handling could be improved with proper type definitions and validation:

- async list(anchor: string): Promise<IIssueLabel[]> {
+ type APIError = {
+   response?: {
+     data: {
+       error: string;
+       message: string;
+     };
+   };
+ };
+ 
+ async list(anchor: string): Promise<IIssueLabel[]> {
    return this.get(`/api/public/anchor/${anchor}/labels/`)
-     .then((response) => response?.data)
+     .then((response) => {
+       if (!response?.data) throw new Error('Invalid response format');
+       return response.data;
+     })
-     .catch((error) => {
+     .catch((error: APIError) => {
        throw error?.response?.data;
      });
  }
packages/services/src/module/sites-module.service.ts (1)

13-31: Consider creating a base class for sites services

Multiple services (SitesLabelService, SitesModuleService) share similar patterns for list operations and error handling. Consider extracting common functionality into a base class.

abstract class BaseSitesService<T> extends APIService {
  constructor(BASE_URL?: string) {
    super(BASE_URL || API_BASE_URL);
  }

  protected async getList<T>(endpoint: string): Promise<T[]> {
    return this.get(endpoint)
      .then((response) => {
        if (!response?.data) throw new Error('Invalid response format');
        return response.data;
      })
      .catch((error: APIError) => {
        throw error?.response?.data;
      });
  }
}

export class SitesModuleService extends BaseSitesService<TPublicModule> {
  async list(anchor: string): Promise<TPublicModule[]> {
    return this.getList(`/api/public/anchor/${anchor}/modules/`);
  }
}
packages/services/src/cycle/sites-cycle.service.ts (1)

18-23: Standardize JSDoc parameter descriptions across services

The parameter description style varies across services. Consider standardizing the format:

  /**
   * Retrieves list of cycles for a specific anchor.
-  * @param anchor - The anchor identifier for the published entity
+  * @param {string} anchor - The anchor identifier for the published entity
   * @returns {Promise<TPublicCycle[]>} The list of cycles
   * @throws {Error} If the request fails
   */
packages/services/src/user/sites-member.service.ts (2)

1-6: Consider reorganizing directory structure

The member service is currently in the user directory. Consider creating a dedicated member directory for better organization and separation of concerns.

- packages/services/src/user/sites-member.service.ts
+ packages/services/src/member/sites-member.service.ts

1-31: Consider implementing architectural improvements across all services

Several architectural improvements could enhance the maintainability and reliability of these services:

  1. Create a shared base class for common functionality
  2. Implement consistent error handling with proper types
  3. Add input validation for anchor parameters
  4. Standardize documentation format
  5. Consider using OpenAPI/Swagger for API documentation and type generation

Would you like me to provide a detailed implementation plan for these improvements?

packages/services/src/file/file-upload.service.ts (1)

Line range hint 24-44: Consider improving error handling and type safety.

  1. The cancelSource type could be more specific than any
  2. Error handling could be more structured with custom error types
-  private cancelSource: any;
+  private cancelSource: ReturnType<typeof axios.CancelToken.source>;

   async uploadFile(
     url: string,
     data: FormData,
   ): Promise<void> {
     this.cancelSource = axios.CancelToken.source();
     return this.post(url, data, {
       headers: {
         "Content-Type": "multipart/form-data",
       },
       cancelToken: this.cancelSource.token,
       withCredentials: false,
     })
       .then((response) => response?.data)
       .catch((error) => {
         if (axios.isCancel(error)) {
           console.log(error.message);
+          throw new UploadCanceledError(error.message);
         } else {
-          throw error?.response?.data;
+          throw new UploadFailedError(error?.response?.data);
         }
       });
   }
packages/services/src/file/helper.ts (1)

32-36: Consider making URL parsing more robust.

The current implementation might break with malformed URLs or URLs with query parameters.

 export const getAssetIdFromUrl = (src: string): string => {
-  const sourcePaths = src.split("/");
-  const assetUrl = sourcePaths[sourcePaths.length - 1];
+  try {
+    const url = new URL(src);
+    const pathname = url.pathname;
+    const assetUrl = pathname.split("/").pop() || "";
+    return assetUrl.split("?")[0]; // Remove query parameters if any
+  } catch {
+    // Handle invalid URLs
+    const sourcePaths = src.split("/");
+    return (sourcePaths.pop() || "").split("?")[0];
+  }
-  return assetUrl;
 };
space/core/store/members.store.ts (1)

Line range hint 57-66: Fix error message in catch block

The error message matches the context of the operation being performed.

-      console.error("Failed to fetch members:", error);
+      console.error("Failed to fetch members:", error);
packages/services/src/file/file.service.ts (2)

28-34: Consider adding specific error types

The error handling is consistent, but consider defining specific error types for better error handling in consuming code.

Example implementation:

type FileServiceError = {
  code: string;
  message: string;
  details?: unknown;
};

async deleteNewAsset(assetPath: string): Promise<void> {
  return this.delete(assetPath)
    .then((response) => response?.data)
    .catch((error) => {
      const serviceError: FileServiceError = {
        code: error?.response?.status,
        message: error?.response?.data?.message || 'Unknown error',
        details: error?.response?.data
      };
      throw serviceError;
    });
}

43-50: Enhance API endpoint construction

Consider extracting API endpoints as constants to improve maintainability.

Example implementation:

private static readonly ENDPOINTS = {
  fileAssets: (workspaceId: string, assetKey: string) => 
    `/api/workspaces/file-assets/${workspaceId}/${assetKey}`,
  restore: (workspaceId: string, assetKey: string) =>
    `${FileService.ENDPOINTS.fileAssets(workspaceId, assetKey)}/restore/`
};

Also applies to: 59-66

packages/types/src/cycle/cycle.d.ts (1)

136-140: Consider adding more cycle metadata

The TPublicCycle type includes basic cycle information. Consider adding more metadata that might be useful for public views, such as:

  • start_date
  • end_date
  • progress statistics
 export type TPublicCycle = {
   id: string;
   name: string;
   status: string;
+  start_date?: string;
+  end_date?: string;
+  progress?: {
+    completed: number;
+    total: number;
+  };
 };
packages/services/src/api.service.ts (1)

37-49: Improve URL handling with a dedicated URL utility.

The current implementation handles path prefixes directly in the interceptor. Consider extracting this logic into a dedicated URL utility function for better maintainability and reusability.

+ // Add to a new file: utils/url.ts
+ export const getRedirectUrl = (currentPath: string): { prefix: string; path: string } => {
+   const prefixes = ["/god-mode", "/spaces"];
+   for (const prefix of prefixes) {
+     if (currentPath.startsWith(prefix)) {
+       return {
+         prefix,
+         path: currentPath.replace(prefix, "")
+       };
+     }
+   }
+   return { prefix: "", path: currentPath };
+ };

  // In setupInterceptors:
- let prefix = "";
- let updatedPath = currentPath;
- 
- // Check for special path prefixes
- if (currentPath.startsWith("/god-mode")) {
-   prefix = "/god-mode";
-   updatedPath = currentPath.replace("/god-mode", "");
- } else if (currentPath.startsWith("/spaces")) {
-   prefix = "/spaces";
-   updatedPath = currentPath.replace("/spaces", "");
- }
+ const { prefix, path: updatedPath } = getRedirectUrl(currentPath);
packages/types/src/issues/issue.d.ts (1)

132-160: Consider extracting common response types.

The IPublicIssue interface shares many fields with TIssue. Consider creating a base interface for common fields to reduce duplication.

+ interface IBaseIssueFields {
+   description_html?: string;
+   created_at: string;
+   updated_at: string;
+   // ... other common fields
+ }

- export interface IPublicIssue extends Pick<TIssue, ...> {
+ export interface IPublicIssue extends IBaseIssueFields {
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ac14d57 and de7f9de.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • yarn.lock is excluded by !**/yarn.lock, !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (65)
  • packages/services/src/api.service.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/services/src/auth/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/services/src/auth/sites-auth.service.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/services/src/cycle/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/services/src/cycle/sites-cycle.service.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/services/src/file/file-upload.service.ts (2 hunks)
  • packages/services/src/file/file.service.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/services/src/file/helper.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/services/src/file/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/services/src/file/sites-file.service.ts (5 hunks)
  • packages/services/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/services/src/issue/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/services/src/issue/sites-issue.service.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/services/src/label/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/services/src/label/sites-label.service.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/services/src/module/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/services/src/module/sites-module.service.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/services/src/project/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/services/src/project/sites-publish.service.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/services/src/state/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/services/src/state/sites-state.service.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/services/src/user/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/services/src/user/sites-member.service.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/services/src/user/user.service.ts (2 hunks)
  • packages/types/src/auth.d.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/types/src/cycle/cycle.d.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/types/src/issues/activity/issue_comment.d.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/types/src/issues/issue.d.ts (2 hunks)
  • packages/types/src/module/modules.d.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/types/src/users.d.ts (1 hunks)
  • space/app/[workspaceSlug]/[projectId]/page.ts (2 hunks)
  • space/core/components/account/auth-forms/auth-root.tsx (2 hunks)
  • space/core/components/account/auth-forms/password.tsx (1 hunks)
  • space/core/components/account/auth-forms/unique-code.tsx (1 hunks)
  • space/core/components/issues/navbar/user-avatar.tsx (1 hunks)
  • space/core/components/issues/peek-overview/comment/add-comment.tsx (2 hunks)
  • space/core/components/issues/peek-overview/comment/comment-detail-card.tsx (3 hunks)
  • space/core/hooks/use-mention.tsx (1 hunks)
  • space/core/services/api.service.ts (0 hunks)
  • space/core/services/auth.service.ts (0 hunks)
  • space/core/services/cycle.service.ts (0 hunks)
  • space/core/services/instance.service.ts (0 hunks)
  • space/core/services/issue.service.ts (0 hunks)
  • space/core/services/label.service.ts (0 hunks)
  • space/core/services/member.service.ts (0 hunks)
  • space/core/services/module.service.ts (0 hunks)
  • space/core/services/project-member.service.ts (0 hunks)
  • space/core/services/publish.service.ts (0 hunks)
  • space/core/services/state.service.ts (0 hunks)
  • space/core/services/user.service.ts (0 hunks)
  • space/core/store/cycle.store.ts (3 hunks)
  • space/core/store/helpers/base-issues.store.ts (3 hunks)
  • space/core/store/instance.store.ts (2 hunks)
  • space/core/store/issue-detail.store.ts (15 hunks)
  • space/core/store/issue.store.ts (5 hunks)
  • space/core/store/label.store.ts (4 hunks)
  • space/core/store/members.store.ts (4 hunks)
  • space/core/store/module.store.ts (4 hunks)
  • space/core/store/profile.store.ts (3 hunks)
  • space/core/store/publish/publish_list.store.ts (2 hunks)
  • space/core/store/state.store.ts (4 hunks)
  • space/core/store/user.store.ts (3 hunks)
  • space/core/types/issue.d.ts (2 hunks)
  • space/helpers/editor.helper.ts (2 hunks)
  • space/package.json (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (12)
  • space/core/services/member.service.ts
  • space/core/services/instance.service.ts
  • space/core/services/label.service.ts
  • space/core/services/auth.service.ts
  • space/core/services/state.service.ts
  • space/core/services/cycle.service.ts
  • space/core/services/module.service.ts
  • space/core/services/api.service.ts
  • space/core/services/publish.service.ts
  • space/core/services/project-member.service.ts
  • space/core/services/issue.service.ts
  • space/core/services/user.service.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
  • packages/services/src/state/index.ts
  • packages/services/src/issue/index.ts
  • packages/services/src/label/index.ts
  • packages/services/src/file/index.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: build-space
  • GitHub Check: build-admin
  • GitHub Check: lint-web
🔇 Additional comments (50)
space/core/store/profile.store.ts (2)

3-4: LGTM! Import change aligns with services package refactoring.

The updated import path from the new services package aligns well with the PR's objective of centralizing service implementations.


87-87: LGTM! Method name change improves clarity.

The updated method name profile() is more concise and follows RESTful naming conventions while maintaining the same functionality.

space/core/store/instance.store.ts (2)

3-4: LGTM! Import path updated correctly.

The import path change from local services to the new @plane/services package aligns with the PR objective of centralizing services.


Line range hint 1-77: Overall implementation looks solid!

The store implementation follows good practices with proper:

  • TypeScript interfaces and type safety
  • Error handling with meaningful error messages
  • Loading state management
  • MobX decorators and actions
packages/services/src/auth/index.ts (1)

2-2: LGTM: Exporting sites-auth.service for extended authentication functionalities

The addition of export * from "./sites-auth.service"; correctly exposes the new authentication service functionalities. No issues found.

packages/services/src/project/index.ts (1)

1-2: LGTM! Export statement follows TypeScript conventions.

The addition of the sites-publish service export aligns with the PR objective of replacing space services.

packages/types/src/auth.d.ts (1)

10-10: LGTM! Well-structured type addition

The new is_password_autoset boolean property is properly typed and follows existing naming conventions.

space/core/hooks/use-mention.tsx (1)

3-4: LGTM! Import path updated correctly

The import has been properly updated to use the centralized services package.

packages/services/src/label/sites-label.service.ts (1)

24-25: Consider input validation for the anchor parameter

The anchor parameter is used directly in the URL without sanitization.

space/app/[workspaceSlug]/[projectId]/page.ts (2)

2-3: LGTM! Service migration looks good.

The change from PublishService to SitesProjectPublishService aligns with the PR's objective of replacing space services.

Also applies to: 6-6


24-24: Method name change improves clarity.

The new method name retrieveSettingsByProjectId better describes its purpose compared to the previous fetchAnchorFromProjectDetails.

space/core/store/cycle.store.ts (2)

19-19: LGTM! Service migration is consistent.

The change to SitesCycleService follows the same pattern as other service migrations in this PR.

Also applies to: 29-29


36-36: Verify response type compatibility.

The method name has changed from getCycles to list. While the change works, please ensure that the response type from list() matches the expected TPublicCycle[] type.

✅ Verification successful

Type compatibility verified successfully

The list() method in SitesCycleService returns Promise<TPublicCycle[]>, which exactly matches the expected type in the store. The type safety is maintained after the method rename.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the list method definition in SitesCycleService
ast-grep --pattern 'class SitesCycleService {
  $$$
  list($_): $return {
    $$$
  }
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 96


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any class with a list method that might be cycle-related
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ {
  $$$
  list($_) {
    $$$
  }
  $$$
}'

# Search for files containing "Cycle" type definitions
rg "type.*Cycle|interface.*Cycle" -g "*.ts"

# Search for the actual service class being used
rg "class.*CycleService" -g "*.ts"

Length of output: 3468


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check imports in the store file
cat space/core/store/cycle.store.ts

# Check the service implementations
cat packages/services/src/cycle/sites-cycle.service.ts

Length of output: 2352

packages/services/src/file/file-upload.service.ts (2)

5-9: Great addition of class documentation!

The JSDoc comments improve code maintainability by clearly describing the class purpose.


17-23: Comprehensive method documentation.

The detailed JSDoc for uploadFile method clearly describes parameters, return type, and potential errors.

packages/services/src/file/helper.ts (2)

9-14: LGTM! Well-structured file upload payload generator.

The function is well-documented and properly typed with TypeScript.


21-25: LGTM! Clean metadata extraction.

The function provides a clean interface for extracting file metadata.

space/core/store/publish/publish_list.store.ts (2)

3-4: LGTM: Clean service import update

The import change aligns with the service refactoring initiative.


31-31: Verify service method name consistency

The method name change from fetchPublishSettings to retrieveSettingsByAnchor suggests a new naming convention. Let's verify this pattern across other site services.

Also applies to: 39-39

✅ Verification successful

Naming convention is consistently applied

The new retrieveBy* pattern is consistently used across the codebase:

  • retrieveSettingsByAnchor
  • retrieveSettingsByProjectId
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for method naming patterns across site services
rg -g "src/**/*service.ts" "retrieve.*ByAnchor|list" packages/services/

Length of output: 73


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for both old and new method naming patterns
echo "=== Searching for method naming patterns ==="
rg "fetch\w+Settings|retrieve\w+ByAnchor" space/

echo -e "\n=== Looking for SitesProjectPublishService implementation ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'class SitesProjectPublishService {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 1174


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Look for the service file and similar services
echo "=== Searching for publish service files ==="
fd "publish.*service" space/

echo -e "\n=== Searching for similar service patterns ==="
rg -g "**/*service*" "class.*Service.*{" space/

Length of output: 384


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Broader search for service and method patterns
echo "=== Searching for service class definitions ==="
rg "class.*Service" space/

echo -e "\n=== Searching for similar retrieve methods ==="
rg "retrieve\w+By" space/

echo -e "\n=== Looking for publish service file ==="
fd -e ts "publish.*" space/

Length of output: 1049

space/core/store/state.store.ts (2)

3-4: LGTM: Clean service import update

The import change aligns with the service refactoring initiative.


24-24: Consistent service refactoring

The changes follow a consistent pattern:

  1. Updated service type annotation
  2. Service instantiation in constructor
  3. Method name changed to follow RESTful conventions (list)

Also applies to: 36-36, 48-48

packages/types/src/issues/activity/issue_comment.d.ts (1)

41-66: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix undefined type references

The new TIssuePublicComment type references several undefined types:

  • ActorDetail
  • IssueDetail
  • ProjectDetail
  • IWorkspaceLite

Please import these types or define them in this file.

Note: The change from string to Date for timestamps is a breaking change that needs to be handled carefully.

space/core/store/label.store.ts (2)

3-4: LGTM: Clean service import update

The import change aligns with the service refactoring initiative.


21-21: Consistent service refactoring pattern

The changes follow the established pattern seen in other stores:

  1. Updated service type
  2. Constructor initialization
  3. RESTful method naming (list)

Let's verify the consistency of this pattern across all stores:

Also applies to: 33-33, 56-56

✅ Verification successful

Service refactoring pattern verified across stores

The consistent pattern is confirmed across multiple store files:

  • Service type declarations (e.g., labelService: SitesLabelService)
  • Constructor initialization (e.g., this.labelService = new SitesLabelService())
  • RESTful method naming (e.g., list method)

This pattern is consistently implemented in state.store.ts, issue.store.ts, module.store.ts, cycle.store.ts, members.store.ts, and other store files.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar service refactoring patterns across store files
rg -g "store.ts" "Sites.*Service.*=.*new.*Sites.*Service\(\)" space/core/store/

Length of output: 79


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for service type declarations in store files
echo "=== Service Type Declarations ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ {
  $name: Sites$_Service;
  $$$
}'

echo -e "\n=== Constructor Patterns ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'constructor($$$) {
  $$$
  this.$_ = $_
  $$$
}'

echo -e "\n=== RESTful Methods ==="
rg -g "store.ts" "async (list|get|create|update|delete)" space/core/store/

Length of output: 425


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# First, find all store files
echo "=== Store Files ==="
fd "store.ts$" space/core/store/

echo -e "\n=== Service Types ==="
rg -g "store.ts" "Sites.*Service" space/core/store/

echo -e "\n=== Class Declarations ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 66441


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the specific store file first
echo "=== Label Store Content ==="
cat space/core/store/label.store.ts

echo -e "\n=== Service Patterns in Store Files ==="
rg -g "*.store.ts" "Sites.*Service" space/core/store/

Length of output: 4300

packages/services/src/project/sites-publish.service.ts (1)

13-46: Well-structured service implementation with clear separation of concerns

The service implementation is clean, well-documented, and follows TypeScript best practices. The methods are properly typed and have clear responsibilities.

packages/services/src/auth/sites-auth.service.ts (1)

13-49: Well-implemented auth service with consistent error handling

The service implementation is clean, well-documented, and follows a consistent error handling pattern across methods.

space/core/store/members.store.ts (1)

Line range hint 21-34: Clean migration to SitesMemberService

The migration to the new service is clean and maintains the existing store patterns.

space/core/store/module.store.ts (1)

Line range hint 22-35: Clean migration to SitesModuleService

The migration to the new service is clean and maintains the existing store patterns.

space/helpers/editor.helper.ts (2)

4-4: LGTM: Service replacement aligns with refactoring goals

The replacement of FileService with SitesFileService is consistent with the PR's objective of transitioning to the new services package.

Also applies to: 8-8


44-44: Verify error handling in file operations

While the implementation looks correct, ensure that error cases are properly handled by the calling components when these file operations fail.

Run this script to check error handling in components using these methods:

Also applies to: 46-46, 51-51, 53-53, 56-56

packages/types/src/module/modules.d.ts (1)

121-124: LGTM: Well-defined public type

The TPublicModule type appropriately captures the essential properties needed for public consumption.

packages/services/src/user/user.service.ts (1)

26-32: Verify validateStatus bypass implications

The validateStatus: null option bypasses interceptors for unauthorized errors. Ensure this doesn't bypass important error handling in the authentication flow.

Run this script to check authentication handling:

✅ Verification successful

validateStatus bypass is correctly implemented

The validateStatus: null usage is an intentional and documented pattern used consistently across authentication-related endpoints to handle unauthorized states gracefully. The error handling remains intact as errors are explicitly caught and thrown.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find authentication-related interceptors and handlers
rg -A 5 'validateStatus.*null' 
ast-grep --pattern 'axios.interceptors.response.use($$$)'

Length of output: 4398

space/core/types/issue.d.ts (1)

1-1: LGTM! Type safety improvement

The change from Comment[] to TIssuePublicComment[] enhances type safety by using a more specific type for comments.

Let's verify that all consumers of the IIssue interface are updated:

Also applies to: 61-61

✅ Verification successful

Type change is properly implemented and safe

The change from Comment[] to TIssuePublicComment[] is consistently implemented across the codebase. All components, services, and type definitions are properly aligned with this change, maintaining type safety and improving code clarity.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining usage of Comment[] type
rg "Comment\[\]" --type ts

# Search for places where IIssue interface is used
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $X extends IIssue'

Length of output: 772


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check type definitions for comment types
ast-grep --pattern 'type TIssuePublicComment'
ast-grep --pattern 'type TIssueActivityComment'
ast-grep --pattern 'type TIssueComment'

# Look for direct usage of IIssue
rg "IIssue" --type ts -A 2

Length of output: 68786


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for type definitions of comment types
rg "type TIssuePublicComment =" --type ts -A 3
rg "type TIssueActivityComment =" --type ts -A 3
rg "type TIssueComment =" --type ts -A 3

# Search for interfaces/types extending or using these types
rg "extends.*Comment" --type ts
rg "implements.*Comment" --type ts

Length of output: 1661


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get full type definitions
rg -A 15 "type TIssuePublicComment = {" --type ts
rg -A 15 "type TIssueActivityComment =" --type ts
rg -A 15 "type TIssueComment = {" --type ts

# Check imports and usage
rg "TIssuePublicComment" --type ts

Length of output: 3459

space/core/components/issues/peek-overview/comment/add-comment.tsx (2)

8-9: LGTM! Service migration

The migration from FileService to SitesFileService aligns with the PR objective.

Also applies to: 16-16


18-20: Verify form submission with new type

The form handling has been updated to use TIssuePublicComment. Please ensure that all required fields of TIssuePublicComment are properly handled in the form submission.

Let's check the TIssuePublicComment type definition:

Also applies to: 44-46

✅ Verification successful

Form submission implementation is correct

The form only needs to collect comment_html as other required fields of TIssuePublicComment are handled by:

  • Backend API (timestamps, IDs)
  • Current user session (actor details)
  • Component context (workspace, project, issue details)

The usage of Partial<TIssuePublicComment> is appropriate here.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find TIssuePublicComment type definition
ast-grep --pattern 'type TIssuePublicComment = {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 2113


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find form submission logic in add-comment.tsx
cat space/core/components/issues/peek-overview/comment/add-comment.tsx

Length of output: 3405

space/core/store/issue.store.ts (2)

2-3: LGTM! Service migration

The migration from IssueService to SitesIssueService is consistent with the PR objective.

Also applies to: 26-26, 38-38


61-61: Verify error handling in new service method

The method name has changed from fetchPublicIssues to list. Please ensure that error handling in SitesIssueService's list method matches the previous implementation.

Let's check the error handling implementation:

Also applies to: 88-88

✅ Verification successful

Error handling implementation verified

The list method in SitesIssueService maintains proper error handling, throwing the error response in a consistent pattern with other service methods. The implementation is actually more comprehensive as it provides the full response object for error handling.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find error handling in SitesIssueService
ast-grep --pattern 'class SitesIssueService {
  $$$
  list($_, $_) {
    $$$
  }
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 91


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find relevant service files
fd -t f "issue.*service" -I

# Search for class and method implementations
rg -l "class.*IssueService" --type ts

# After finding files, we'll search for both method implementations
rg "(fetchPublicIssues|list).*\{" --type ts -A 10

Length of output: 65790

space/core/components/issues/navbar/user-avatar.tsx (1)

10-13: LGTM! Import changes align with service package refactoring.

The AuthService import has been correctly updated to use the new services package.

packages/types/src/users.d.ts (1)

185-194: LGTM! Well-structured type definition.

The TPublicMember type is well-defined with clear property names and proper TypeScript types.

space/core/components/account/auth-forms/unique-code.tsx (1)

5-7: LGTM! Clean import restructuring.

The import changes align with the PR objective of centralizing services in the @plane/services package.

space/core/components/account/auth-forms/auth-root.tsx (1)

6-8: LGTM! Consistent service replacement.

The AuthService has been correctly replaced with SitesAuthService, maintaining the same authentication functionality while aligning with the centralized services approach.

Also applies to: 31-31

space/core/components/issues/peek-overview/comment/comment-detail-card.tsx (2)

6-9: LGTM! Clean import organization.

The imports are well-organized with clear separation using comments.


21-21: LGTM! Consistent type usage.

The type updates from Comment to TIssuePublicComment are applied consistently across props and method parameters.

Also applies to: 51-51

space/core/components/account/auth-forms/password.tsx (1)

6-8: LGTM! Import changes align with the service refactoring.

The changes correctly update the imports to use the new services package and constants, maintaining the same functionality.

space/core/store/issue-detail.store.ts (4)

7-8: LGTM! Service imports updated correctly.

The imports have been updated to use the new services package, which aligns with the refactoring objective.


33-33: Return type updated for better type safety.

The addIssueComment method's return type has been updated from Promise<Comment> to Promise<TIssuePublicComment>, improving type safety.


60-61: LGTM! Service instantiation updated correctly.

The store now uses the new SitesIssueService and SitesFileService classes from the services package.

Also applies to: 92-93


124-124: Method calls updated to match new service interfaces.

The service method calls have been updated to use the new method names from the services package, maintaining the same functionality:

  • retrieve instead of getIssueById
  • listComments instead of getIssueComments
  • addComment instead of createIssueComment
  • And so on.

The changes are consistent across all method calls.

Also applies to: 147-147, 169-169, 197-197, 199-199, 215-215, 289-289, 293-293, 325-325, 327-327, 357-357, 362-362, 379-379, 382-382, 411-411, 414-414, 432-432, 435-435

space/core/store/helpers/base-issues.store.ts (1)

10-10: LGTM! Service import and instantiation updated correctly.

The changes properly integrate the new SitesIssueService from the services package:

  1. Import statement updated to use @plane/services
  2. Service instantiation updated to use SitesIssueService

Also applies to: 100-100

space/package.json (1)

25-25: LGTM! Added required dependency.

The @plane/services package has been added as a dependency, which is necessary for the service refactoring.

space/core/store/instance.store.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
packages/services/src/file/sites-file.service.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
space/core/hooks/use-mention.tsx Show resolved Hide resolved
packages/services/src/user/user.service.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
packages/types/src/issues/issue.d.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
space/core/store/user.store.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
packages/services/src/file/sites-file.service.ts (1)

Line range hint 76-93: Add upload cancellation support to file uploads.

The uploadAsset method should utilize the cancelSource to allow for upload cancellation.

 async uploadAsset(anchor: string, data: TFileEntityInfo, file: File): Promise<TFileSignedURLResponse> {
   const fileMetaData = getFileMetaDataForUpload(file);
-  return this.post(`/api/public/assets/v2/anchor/${anchor}/`, {
+  return this.post(`/api/public/assets/v2/anchor/${anchor}/`, 
+  {
     ...data,
     ...fileMetaData,
-  })
+  },
+  { cancelToken: this.cancelSource.token })
     .then(async (response) => {
       const signedURLResponse: TFileSignedURLResponse = response?.data;
       const fileUploadPayload = generateFileUploadPayload(signedURLResponse, file);
-      await this.fileUploadService.uploadFile(signedURLResponse.upload_data.url, fileUploadPayload);
+      await this.fileUploadService.uploadFile(
+        signedURLResponse.upload_data.url,
+        fileUploadPayload,
+        { cancelToken: this.cancelSource.token }
+      );
       await this.updateAssetUploadStatus(anchor, signedURLResponse.asset_id);
       return signedURLResponse;
     })
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
packages/services/src/file/sites-file.service.ts (2)

16-29: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix cancelSource typing and initialization.

The cancelSource property is still typed as any and not properly initialized, which could lead to runtime errors.

Import and use the proper type from axios:

+ import axios, { CancelTokenSource } from "axios";

 export class SitesFileService extends FileService {
-  private cancelSource: any;
+  private cancelSource: CancelTokenSource;
   fileUploadService: FileUploadService;

   constructor(BASE_URL?: string) {
     super(BASE_URL || API_BASE_URL);
+    this.cancelSource = axios.CancelToken.source();
     this.cancelUpload = this.cancelUpload.bind(this);
     // services
     this.fileUploadService = new FileUploadService();
   }

111-116: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix the cancelUpload implementation.

The method still uses the incorrect cancelUpload() method instead of cancel().

 cancelUpload() {
-  this.cancelSource.cancelUpload();
+  this.cancelSource.cancel("Upload cancelled by the user.");
 }
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
packages/types/src/issues/issue_reaction.d.ts (2)

10-13: Consider using a union type for the reaction field.

Instead of using a broad string type for reactions, consider defining a union type of allowed reactions for better type safety and autocomplete support.

+export type TAllowedReactions = '👍' | '👎' | '❤️' | '😄' | '🎉' | '😕';
 export interface IIssuePublicReaction {
   actor_details: IUserLite;
-  reaction: string;
+  reaction: TAllowedReactions;
 }

1-26: Consider standardizing naming conventions.

The file uses mixed naming conventions:

  • Snake case: actor_details, reaction_id, issue_id
  • Camel case: actorDetails (in type names)

Consider standardizing to one convention throughout the codebase for better maintainability.

packages/types/src/issues/issue.d.ts (2)

123-123: Consider using the enum directly for better extensibility.

Instead of using a union of specific enum values, consider using the enum type directly. This would make the type automatically adapt to any new service types added to the enum in the future.

-export type TIssueServiceType = EIssueServiceType.ISSUES | EIssueServiceType.EPICS;
+export type TIssueServiceType = EIssueServiceType;

155-182: Improve response types consistency and maintainability.

  1. The TPublicIssuesResponse is missing the total_results field that exists in TIssuesResponse.
  2. Consider breaking down the nested structure into smaller, reusable types.
+// Define base nested results type
+type TNestedResults<T> = {
+  results: T[];
+  total_results: number;
+};
+
+// Define grouped results type
+type TGroupedResults<T> = {
+  [key: string]: {
+    results: T[] | { [key: string]: TNestedResults<T> };
+    total_results: number;
+  };
+};
+
 type TPublicIssueResponseResults =
-  | IPublicIssue[]
-  | {
-      [key: string]: {
-        results:
-          | IPublicIssue[]
-          | {
-              [key: string]: {
-                results: IPublicIssue[];
-                total_results: number;
-              };
-            };
-        total_results: number;
-      };
-    };
+  | IPublicIssue[]
+  | TGroupedResults<IPublicIssue>;

 export type TPublicIssuesResponse = {
   grouped_by: string;
   next_cursor: string;
   prev_cursor: string;
   next_page_results: boolean;
   prev_page_results: boolean;
   total_count: number;
   count: number;
   total_pages: number;
   extra_stats: null;
   results: TPublicIssueResponseResults;
+  total_results: number;
 };
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between de7f9de and d919125.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • packages/services/src/file/sites-file.service.ts (5 hunks)
  • packages/types/src/issues/issue.d.ts (2 hunks)
  • packages/types/src/issues/issue_reaction.d.ts (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: build-space
  • GitHub Check: build-admin
  • GitHub Check: lint-web
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
packages/services/src/file/sites-file.service.ts (2)

1-16: LGTM! Well-structured imports and class documentation.

The imports are properly organized, and the class documentation accurately reflects the inheritance hierarchy and purpose of the service.


Line range hint 94-110: LGTM! Well-implemented restore functionality.

The method is well-documented and follows consistent error handling patterns.

packages/types/src/issues/issue_reaction.d.ts (1)

1-1: LGTM! Import statement is correctly defined.

The import of IUserLite is necessary for the new interfaces and follows the correct relative path structure.

packages/types/src/issues/issue.d.ts (3)

121-121: LGTM! Clear and well-defined widget type.

The TIssueDetailWidget type effectively captures the different aspects of issue details using a union of string literals.


125-153: LGTM! Well-structured public issue interface.

The IPublicIssue interface effectively uses TypeScript's Pick utility type to select relevant properties from TIssue while adding new properties for public-specific data.


6-6: Verify the import path alias configuration.

The import path @/plane-web/types uses an alias. Ensure that the TypeScript configuration (tsconfig.json) properly defines this path alias to prevent compilation issues.

✅ Verification successful

Import path alias is correctly configured.

The import path @/plane-web/types is properly configured in the TypeScript configuration files and is used consistently across the codebase. The path alias maps to the community edition (ce/*) directory, which is a valid and intentional design pattern in the project.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if the path alias is properly configured in tsconfig
fd tsconfig.json | xargs cat | jq '.compilerOptions.paths["@/plane-web/types"]'

Length of output: 144


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for usage of this import path pattern across the codebase
rg "@/plane-web/types" --type ts

# Look at the content of tsconfig files
echo "=== TSConfig files ==="
fd tsconfig.json -x cat {}

# Check for path mappings in package.json files
echo "=== Package.json files ==="
fd package.json -x cat {}

Length of output: 25270

packages/types/src/issues/issue_reaction.d.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@sriramveeraghanta sriramveeraghanta merged commit ade4d29 into preview Jan 11, 2025
5 of 10 checks passed
@sriramveeraghanta sriramveeraghanta deleted the refactor/space-services branch January 11, 2025 09:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants