Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CIR][IR][NFC] Fix CallOp builder with void return #629

Merged

Conversation

sitio-couto
Copy link
Collaborator

One of the builders was adding a retun value to the CallOp when given a void return type. The expected behavior is to not add a return value. Two other minor fixes were added to the return value: its constraint was replaced from variadic to optional and it was assigned a name. This prevents function calls with multiple returns and facilitates access to the single return value, respectively.

One of the builders was adding a retun value to the CallOp when given
a void return type. The expected behavior is to not add a return value.
Two other minor fixes were added to the return value: its constraint was
replaced from variadic to optional and it was assigned a name. This
prevents function calls with multiple returns and facilitates access to
the single return value, respectively.
@sitio-couto sitio-couto requested a review from bcardosolopes May 26, 2024 23:48
Copy link
Member

@bcardosolopes bcardosolopes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@bcardosolopes bcardosolopes merged commit 492242b into llvm:main May 28, 2024
7 checks passed
@sitio-couto sitio-couto deleted the vinicius/fix-callop-builder-with-void-ret branch September 10, 2024 22:44
bruteforceboy pushed a commit to bruteforceboy/clangir that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2024
One of the builders was adding a retun value to the CallOp when given a
void return type. The expected behavior is to not add a return value.
Two other minor fixes were added to the return value: its constraint was
replaced from variadic to optional and it was assigned a name. This
prevents function calls with multiple returns and facilitates access to
the single return value, respectively.
Hugobros3 pushed a commit to shady-gang/clangir that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2024
One of the builders was adding a retun value to the CallOp when given a
void return type. The expected behavior is to not add a return value.
Two other minor fixes were added to the return value: its constraint was
replaced from variadic to optional and it was assigned a name. This
prevents function calls with multiple returns and facilitates access to
the single return value, respectively.
smeenai pushed a commit to smeenai/clangir that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2024
One of the builders was adding a retun value to the CallOp when given a
void return type. The expected behavior is to not add a return value.
Two other minor fixes were added to the return value: its constraint was
replaced from variadic to optional and it was assigned a name. This
prevents function calls with multiple returns and facilitates access to
the single return value, respectively.
keryell pushed a commit to keryell/clangir that referenced this pull request Oct 19, 2024
One of the builders was adding a retun value to the CallOp when given a
void return type. The expected behavior is to not add a return value.
Two other minor fixes were added to the return value: its constraint was
replaced from variadic to optional and it was assigned a name. This
prevents function calls with multiple returns and facilitates access to
the single return value, respectively.
lanza pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2024
One of the builders was adding a retun value to the CallOp when given a
void return type. The expected behavior is to not add a return value.
Two other minor fixes were added to the return value: its constraint was
replaced from variadic to optional and it was assigned a name. This
prevents function calls with multiple returns and facilitates access to
the single return value, respectively.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants