Skip to content

[admin-tool] Add a cluster batch processing framework command and a system store empty push task #3988

[admin-tool] Add a cluster batch processing framework command and a system store empty push task

[admin-tool] Add a cluster batch processing framework command and a system store empty push task #3988

Re-run triggered January 16, 2025 02:00
Status Success
Total duration 8m 50s
Artifacts 19
Matrix: Clients / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Controller / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Integrations / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Internal / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Router / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Server / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: StaticAnalysis
ValidateGradleWrapper
8s
ValidateGradleWrapper
StaticAnalysisAndUnitTestsCompletionCheck
0s
StaticAnalysisAndUnitTestsCompletionCheck
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

12 errors and 21 warnings
SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testCorruptMessagesFailFast[186](AA_ON): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked: logNotifier.completed( "TestTopic_562c81aa7b_fb6b8d5e_v1", 1, LongEqualOrGreaterThanMatcher(lowerBound=3), "STANDBY" ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.notifier.LogNotifier.completed(LogNotifier.java:26) However, there were exactly 4 interactions with this mock: logNotifier.started( "TestTopic_562c81aa7b_fb6b8d5e_v1", 2 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportStarted$1(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:107) logNotifier.started( "TestTopic_562c81aa7b_fb6b8d5e_v1", 1 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportStarted$1(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:107) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_562c81aa7b_fb6b8d5e_v1", 2, 3L ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_562c81aa7b_fb6b8d5e_v1", 1, 3L ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[1](true): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations: hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed( <any long> ); Wanted 3 times: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:492) But was 2 times: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2595) -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2595)
SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testCorruptMessagesFailFast[186](AA_ON): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked: logNotifier.completed( "TestTopic_562c81aa7b_fb6b8d5e_v1", 1, LongEqualOrGreaterThanMatcher(lowerBound=3), "STANDBY" ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.notifier.LogNotifier.completed(LogNotifier.java:26) However, there were exactly 4 interactions with this mock: logNotifier.started( "TestTopic_562c81aa7b_fb6b8d5e_v1", 2 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportStarted$1(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:107) logNotifier.started( "TestTopic_562c81aa7b_fb6b8d5e_v1", 1 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportStarted$1(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:107) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_562c81aa7b_fb6b8d5e_v1", 2, 3L ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_562c81aa7b_fb6b8d5e_v1", 1, 3L ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[1](true): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations: hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed( <any long> ); Wanted 3 times: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:492) But was 2 times: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2595) -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2595)
SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testNotifier[0](AA_ON): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.ArgumentsAreDifferent: Argument(s) are different! Wanted: storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_4f882a7d1c_d25b5d5e_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.lambda$testNotifier$35(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:1623) Actual invocations have different arguments: storageMetadataService.getLastOffset( "TestTopic_4f882a7d1c_d25b5d5e_v1", 1 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49) storageMetadataService.getLastOffset( "TestTopic_4f882a7d1c_d25b5d5e_v1", 2 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_4f882a7d1c_d25b5d5e_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$774/0x0000000800789040@35332e3d ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_4f882a7d1c_d25b5d5e_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736988993996, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_4f882a7d1c_d25b5d5e_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$774/0x0000000800789040@32cc4ff1 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_4f882a7d1c_d25b5d5e_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736988993996, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_4f882a7d1c_d25b5d5e_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736988993997, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_4f882a7d1c_d25b5d5e_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$774/0x0000000800789040@3e76531 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_4f882a7d1c_d25b5d5e_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736988993997, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_4f882a7d1c_d25b5d5e_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$774/0x0000000800789040@6769520c ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_4f882a7d1c_d25b5d5e_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807,
SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testNotifier[0](AA_ON): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.ArgumentsAreDifferent: Argument(s) are different! Wanted: storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_4f882a7d1c_d25b5d5e_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.lambda$testNotifier$35(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:1623) Actual invocations have different arguments: storageMetadataService.getLastOffset( "TestTopic_4f882a7d1c_d25b5d5e_v1", 1 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49) storageMetadataService.getLastOffset( "TestTopic_4f882a7d1c_d25b5d5e_v1", 2 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_4f882a7d1c_d25b5d5e_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$774/0x0000000800789040@35332e3d ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_4f882a7d1c_d25b5d5e_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736988993996, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_4f882a7d1c_d25b5d5e_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$774/0x0000000800789040@32cc4ff1 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_4f882a7d1c_d25b5d5e_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736988993996, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_4f882a7d1c_d25b5d5e_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736988993997, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_4f882a7d1c_d25b5d5e_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$774/0x0000000800789040@3e76531 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_4f882a7d1c_d25b5d5e_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736988993997, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_4f882a7d1c_d25b5d5e_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$774/0x0000000800789040@6769520c ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_4f882a7d1c_d25b5d5e_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807,
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testNotifier[0](AA_ON): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.ArgumentsAreDifferent: Argument(s) are different! Wanted: storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_6512d2ea96_d3896a61_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.lambda$testNotifier$35(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:1621) Actual invocations have different arguments: storageMetadataService.getLastOffset( "TestTopic_6512d2ea96_d3896a61_v1", 1 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49) storageMetadataService.getLastOffset( "TestTopic_6512d2ea96_d3896a61_v1", 2 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_6512d2ea96_d3896a61_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$1034/0x00007f0ce875d598@483232c3 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_6512d2ea96_d3896a61_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$1034/0x00007f0ce875d598@ab3404e ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_6512d2ea96_d3896a61_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736993155441, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_6512d2ea96_d3896a61_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736993155441, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_6512d2ea96_d3896a61_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736993155441, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_6512d2ea96_d3896a61_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$1034/0x00007f0ce875d598@63f8e6fb ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_6512d2ea96_d3896a61_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736993155441, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_6512d2ea96_d3896a61_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$1034/0x00007f0ce875d598@54595728 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_6512d2ea96_d3896a61_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testNotifier[0](AA_ON): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.ArgumentsAreDifferent: Argument(s) are different! Wanted: storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_6512d2ea96_d3896a61_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.lambda$testNotifier$35(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:1621) Actual invocations have different arguments: storageMetadataService.getLastOffset( "TestTopic_6512d2ea96_d3896a61_v1", 1 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49) storageMetadataService.getLastOffset( "TestTopic_6512d2ea96_d3896a61_v1", 2 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_6512d2ea96_d3896a61_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$1034/0x00007f0ce875d598@483232c3 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_6512d2ea96_d3896a61_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$1034/0x00007f0ce875d598@ab3404e ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_6512d2ea96_d3896a61_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736993155441, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_6512d2ea96_d3896a61_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736993155441, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_6512d2ea96_d3896a61_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736993155441, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_6512d2ea96_d3896a61_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$1034/0x00007f0ce875d598@63f8e6fb ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_6512d2ea96_d3896a61_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736993155441, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_6512d2ea96_d3896a61_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$1034/0x00007f0ce875d598@54595728 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_6512d2ea96_d3896a61_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775
StaticAnalysis (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
ValidateGradleWrapper
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Clients / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Clients / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Clients / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Integrations / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Integrations / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Controller / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Integrations / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Controller / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Internal / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Controller / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Internal / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Internal / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Router / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Router / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Server / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Server / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Router / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Server / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
StaticAnalysisAndUnitTestsCompletionCheck
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636

Artifacts

Produced during runtime
Name Size
server-jdk17
8.9 MB