[duckdb] Utility to compare table schemas #3981
FelixGVVeniceCI-StaticAnalysisAndUnitTests.yml
on: pull_request
Matrix: Clients / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Controller / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Integrations / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Internal / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Router / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Server / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: StaticAnalysis
ValidateGradleWrapper
9s
StaticAnalysisAndUnitTestsCompletionCheck
0s
Annotations
16 errors and 21 warnings
|
RouterRequestThrottlingTest.testMultiKeyThrottling[2](COMPUTE):
services/venice-router/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/router/throttle/RouterRequestThrottlingTest.java#L188
java.lang.AssertionError: Should have triggered quota in 21 requests, but it took 2 additional request(s) before finally triggering, which is higher than the tolerance threshold of 1. Original elapsed time: 105; total elapsed time: 106 expected [true] but found [false]
|
|
RouterRequestThrottlingTest.testMultiKeyThrottling[2](COMPUTE):
services/venice-router/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/router/throttle/RouterRequestThrottlingTest.java#L188
java.lang.AssertionError: Should have triggered quota in 21 requests, but it took 2 additional request(s) before finally triggering, which is higher than the tolerance threshold of 1. Original elapsed time: 105; total elapsed time: 106 expected [true] but found [false]
|
|
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(
<any long>
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:492)
However, there were exactly 36 interactions with this mock:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
1.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1966)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.010039d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:753)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1607)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.10517699999999999d,
1736981002251L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1274)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1279)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.06787699999999999d,
1736981002252L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1274)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1279)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2587)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1966)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.0053d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:753)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1607)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.056986d,
1736981002265L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1274)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1279)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1966)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.004418d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:753)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1607)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2587)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2587)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1966)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.003927d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStor
|
|
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(
<any long>
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:492)
However, there were exactly 36 interactions with this mock:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
1.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1966)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.010039d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:753)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1607)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.10517699999999999d,
1736981002251L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1274)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1279)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.06787699999999999d,
1736981002252L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1274)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1279)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2587)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1966)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.0053d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:753)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1607)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.056986d,
1736981002265L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1274)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1279)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1966)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.004418d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:753)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1607)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2587)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2587)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1966)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.003927d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStor
|
|
SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testNotifier[0](AA_ON):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.ArgumentsAreDifferent: Argument(s) are different! Wanted:
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_6b00368410_13a21a2c_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.lambda$testNotifier$35(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:1623)
Actual invocations have different arguments:
storageMetadataService.getLastOffset(
"TestTopic_6b00368410_13a21a2c_v1",
1
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49)
storageMetadataService.getLastOffset(
"TestTopic_6b00368410_13a21a2c_v1",
2
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_6b00368410_13a21a2c_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$1006/0x00007fc9ac74c908@2832e75f
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_6b00368410_13a21a2c_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736981099822, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_6b00368410_13a21a2c_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$1006/0x00007fc9ac74c908@283efb1d
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_6b00368410_13a21a2c_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736981099822, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_6b00368410_13a21a2c_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736981099822, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_6b00368410_13a21a2c_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$1006/0x00007fc9ac74c908@1b535d41
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_6b00368410_13a21a2c_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736981099822, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_6b00368410_13a21a2c_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736981099822, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_6b00368410_13a21a2c_v1",
|
|
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testProcessConsumerActionsError:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportError(
<any string>,
1,
<Capturing argument>
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.reportError(StoreIngestionTask.java:4284)
However, there were exactly 195 interactions with this mock:
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(
TestTopic_5bbbe51af6_e6b8ac04_v1-1
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.runTest(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:886)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(
TestTopic_5bbbe51af6_e6b8ac04_v1-1,
true
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:616)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:630)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:577)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4117)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.nextSeqNum();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:639)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.run();
-> at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:539)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1628)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4117)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(
Mock for Store, hashCode: 217999718
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1630)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isHybridMode();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(StoreIngestionTask.java:1547)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(
Mock for Store, hashCode: 217999718
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1631)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(
KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_5bbbe51af6_e6b8ac04_v1-1, attempts=2, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1736981034297},
Mock for Store, hashCode: 217999718
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1920)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(
KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_5bbbe51af6_e6b8ac04_v1-1, attempts=2, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1736981034297}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:569)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportIfCatchUpVersionTopicOffset(
PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_5bbbe51af6_e6b8ac04_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestIgnoredUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestRTOffsetTriedToProduceToVTMap{}, offsetRecord=OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=-1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}, errorReported=false, started=false, lagCaughtUp=false, processedRecordSizeSinceLastSync=0, leaderFollowerState=STANDBY}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(StoreIngestionTask.java:2165)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateLeaderTopicOnFollower(
PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_5bbbe51af6_e6b8ac04_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1, l
|
|
NativeMetadataRepositoryTest.testNativeMetadataRepositoryStats:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/repository/NativeMetadataRepositoryTest.java#L133
java.lang.AssertionError: expected [2000.0] but found [1000.0]
|
|
SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testNotifier[0](AA_ON):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.ArgumentsAreDifferent: Argument(s) are different! Wanted:
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_6b00368410_13a21a2c_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.lambda$testNotifier$35(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:1623)
Actual invocations have different arguments:
storageMetadataService.getLastOffset(
"TestTopic_6b00368410_13a21a2c_v1",
1
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49)
storageMetadataService.getLastOffset(
"TestTopic_6b00368410_13a21a2c_v1",
2
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_6b00368410_13a21a2c_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$1006/0x00007fc9ac74c908@2832e75f
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_6b00368410_13a21a2c_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736981099822, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_6b00368410_13a21a2c_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$1006/0x00007fc9ac74c908@283efb1d
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_6b00368410_13a21a2c_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736981099822, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_6b00368410_13a21a2c_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736981099822, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_6b00368410_13a21a2c_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$1006/0x00007fc9ac74c908@1b535d41
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_6b00368410_13a21a2c_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736981099822, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_6b00368410_13a21a2c_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736981099822, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_6b00368410_13a21a2c_v1",
|
|
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testProcessConsumerActionsError:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportError(
<any string>,
1,
<Capturing argument>
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.reportError(StoreIngestionTask.java:4284)
However, there were exactly 195 interactions with this mock:
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(
TestTopic_5bbbe51af6_e6b8ac04_v1-1
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.runTest(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:886)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(
TestTopic_5bbbe51af6_e6b8ac04_v1-1,
true
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:616)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:630)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:577)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4117)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.nextSeqNum();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:639)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.run();
-> at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:539)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1628)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4117)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(
Mock for Store, hashCode: 217999718
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1630)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isHybridMode();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(StoreIngestionTask.java:1547)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(
Mock for Store, hashCode: 217999718
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1631)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(
KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_5bbbe51af6_e6b8ac04_v1-1, attempts=2, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1736981034297},
Mock for Store, hashCode: 217999718
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1920)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(
KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_5bbbe51af6_e6b8ac04_v1-1, attempts=2, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1736981034297}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:569)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportIfCatchUpVersionTopicOffset(
PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_5bbbe51af6_e6b8ac04_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestIgnoredUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestRTOffsetTriedToProduceToVTMap{}, offsetRecord=OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=-1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}, errorReported=false, started=false, lagCaughtUp=false, processedRecordSizeSinceLastSync=0, leaderFollowerState=STANDBY}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(StoreIngestionTask.java:2165)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateLeaderTopicOnFollower(
PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_5bbbe51af6_e6b8ac04_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1, l
|
|
NativeMetadataRepositoryTest.testNativeMetadataRepositoryStats:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/repository/NativeMetadataRepositoryTest.java#L133
java.lang.AssertionError: expected [2000.0] but found [1000.0]
|
|
SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testNotifier[1](AA_OFF):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.ArgumentsAreDifferent: Argument(s) are different! Wanted:
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_4bca1011a2_e7fe290f_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.lambda$testNotifier$35(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:1621)
Actual invocations have different arguments:
storageMetadataService.getLastOffset(
"TestTopic_4bca1011a2_e7fe290f_v1",
1
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49)
storageMetadataService.getLastOffset(
"TestTopic_4bca1011a2_e7fe290f_v1",
2
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_4bca1011a2_e7fe290f_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$774/0x0000000800789040@2a8cfe01
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_4bca1011a2_e7fe290f_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$774/0x0000000800789040@3a3dab56
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_4bca1011a2_e7fe290f_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736980971634, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_4bca1011a2_e7fe290f_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736980971634, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_4bca1011a2_e7fe290f_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$774/0x0000000800789040@6d51d299
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_4bca1011a2_e7fe290f_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736980971634, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_4bca1011a2_e7fe290f_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736980971634, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_4bca1011a2_e7fe290f_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$774/0x0000000800789040@47d79af6
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
|
|
SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(
<any long>
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:492)
However, there were exactly 24 interactions with this mock:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
8.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1966)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.004107d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:753)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1607)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1966)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.002465d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:753)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1607)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.14180600000000002d,
1736980976565L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1274)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1279)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.05366d,
1736980976567L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1274)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1279)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1966)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.002234d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:753)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1607)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2587)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1966)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.002274d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:753)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1607)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.058549000000000004d,
1736980976577L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1274)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1279)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed();
-> at com.linkedin.davin
|
|
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(
<any long>
);
Wanted 2 times:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:492)
But was 1 time:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2595)
|
|
SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testNotifier[1](AA_OFF):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.ArgumentsAreDifferent: Argument(s) are different! Wanted:
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_4bca1011a2_e7fe290f_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.lambda$testNotifier$35(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:1621)
Actual invocations have different arguments:
storageMetadataService.getLastOffset(
"TestTopic_4bca1011a2_e7fe290f_v1",
1
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49)
storageMetadataService.getLastOffset(
"TestTopic_4bca1011a2_e7fe290f_v1",
2
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_4bca1011a2_e7fe290f_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$774/0x0000000800789040@2a8cfe01
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_4bca1011a2_e7fe290f_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$774/0x0000000800789040@3a3dab56
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_4bca1011a2_e7fe290f_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736980971634, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_4bca1011a2_e7fe290f_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736980971634, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_4bca1011a2_e7fe290f_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$774/0x0000000800789040@6d51d299
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_4bca1011a2_e7fe290f_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736980971634, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_4bca1011a2_e7fe290f_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736980971634, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_4bca1011a2_e7fe290f_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$774/0x0000000800789040@47d79af6
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
|
|
SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(
<any long>
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:492)
However, there were exactly 24 interactions with this mock:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
8.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1966)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.004107d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:753)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1607)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1966)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.002465d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:753)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1607)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.14180600000000002d,
1736980976565L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1274)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1279)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.05366d,
1736980976567L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1274)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1279)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1966)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.002234d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:753)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1607)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2587)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1966)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.002274d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:753)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1607)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.058549000000000004d,
1736980976577L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1274)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1279)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed();
-> at com.linkedin.davin
|
|
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(
<any long>
);
Wanted 2 times:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:492)
But was 1 time:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2595)
|
|
ValidateGradleWrapper
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Integrations / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Integrations / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Integrations / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Controller / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Controller / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Controller / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Router / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Router / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Router / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
StaticAnalysis (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Internal / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Internal / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Internal / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Server / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Server / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Server / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Clients / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Clients / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Clients / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
StaticAnalysisAndUnitTestsCompletionCheck
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
Artifacts
Produced during runtime
| Name | Size | |
|---|---|---|
|
StaticAnalysis
|
652 KB |
|
|
clients-jdk11
|
2.56 MB |
|
|
clients-jdk17
|
2.58 MB |
|
|
clients-jdk8
|
2.52 MB |
|
|
controller-jdk11
|
1.45 MB |
|
|
controller-jdk17
|
1.45 MB |
|
|
controller-jdk8
|
1.45 MB |
|
|
integrations-jdk11
|
562 KB |
|
|
integrations-jdk17
|
568 KB |
|
|
integrations-jdk8
|
548 KB |
|
|
internal-jdk11
|
3.26 MB |
|
|
internal-jdk17
|
3.27 MB |
|
|
internal-jdk8
|
3.24 MB |
|
|
router-jdk11
|
1.05 MB |
|
|
router-jdk17
|
1.05 MB |
|
|
router-jdk8
|
1.04 MB |
|
|
server-jdk11
|
9.07 MB |
|
|
server-jdk17
|
8.99 MB |
|
|
server-jdk8
|
8.96 MB |
|