Skip to content

[duckdb] Utility to compare table schemas #3980

[duckdb] Utility to compare table schemas

[duckdb] Utility to compare table schemas #3980

Triggered via pull request January 15, 2025 22:26
Status Failure
Total duration 1h 0m 45s
Artifacts 18
Matrix: Clients / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Controller / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Integrations / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Internal / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Router / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Server / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: StaticAnalysis
ValidateGradleWrapper
11s
ValidateGradleWrapper
StaticAnalysisAndUnitTestsCompletionCheck
0s
StaticAnalysisAndUnitTestsCompletionCheck
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

13 errors and 20 warnings
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testNotifier[1](AA_OFF): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.ArgumentsAreDifferent: Argument(s) are different! Wanted: storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_61a80542f9_3ba1898d_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.lambda$testNotifier$35(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:1621) Actual invocations have different arguments: storageMetadataService.getLastOffset( "TestTopic_61a80542f9_3ba1898d_v1", 1 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49) storageMetadataService.getLastOffset( "TestTopic_61a80542f9_3ba1898d_v1", 2 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_61a80542f9_3ba1898d_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$714/1261573354@38befbb8 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_61a80542f9_3ba1898d_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$714/1261573354@6785575 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_61a80542f9_3ba1898d_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736980268782, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_61a80542f9_3ba1898d_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736980268782, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_61a80542f9_3ba1898d_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736980268782, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_61a80542f9_3ba1898d_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736980268782, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_61a80542f9_3ba1898d_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$714/1261573354@cb891ef ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_61a80542f9_3ba1898d_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$714/1261573354@f45f017 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_61a80542f9_3ba1898d_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736980268782, l
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testNotifier[1](AA_OFF): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.ArgumentsAreDifferent: Argument(s) are different! Wanted: storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_61a80542f9_3ba1898d_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.lambda$testNotifier$35(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:1621) Actual invocations have different arguments: storageMetadataService.getLastOffset( "TestTopic_61a80542f9_3ba1898d_v1", 1 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49) storageMetadataService.getLastOffset( "TestTopic_61a80542f9_3ba1898d_v1", 2 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_61a80542f9_3ba1898d_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$714/1261573354@38befbb8 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_61a80542f9_3ba1898d_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$714/1261573354@6785575 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_61a80542f9_3ba1898d_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736980268782, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_61a80542f9_3ba1898d_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736980268782, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_61a80542f9_3ba1898d_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736980268782, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_61a80542f9_3ba1898d_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736980268782, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_61a80542f9_3ba1898d_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$714/1261573354@cb891ef ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_61a80542f9_3ba1898d_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$714/1261573354@f45f017 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_61a80542f9_3ba1898d_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736980268782, l
SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations: hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed( <any long> ); Wanted 2 times: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:492) But was 1 time: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2595)
SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[1](true): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations: hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed( <any long> ); Wanted 3 times: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:492) But was 2 times: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2595) -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2595)
SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations: hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed( <any long> ); Wanted 2 times: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:492) But was 1 time: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2595)
SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[1](true): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations: hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed( <any long> ); Wanted 3 times: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:492) But was 2 times: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2595) -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2595)
Server / UT & CodeCov (17)
The job running on runner GitHub Actions 215 has exceeded the maximum execution time of 60 minutes.
Server / UT & CodeCov (17)
The operation was canceled.
StaticAnalysisAndUnitTestsCompletionCheck
Process completed with exit code 1.
ValidateGradleWrapper
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Integrations / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Integrations / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Integrations / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Controller / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Controller / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Controller / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Router / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Router / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
StaticAnalysis (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Router / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Internal / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Internal / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Internal / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Server / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Server / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Clients / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Clients / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Clients / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
StaticAnalysisAndUnitTestsCompletionCheck
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636

Artifacts

Produced during runtime
Name Size
StaticAnalysis
651 KB
clients-jdk11
2.56 MB
clients-jdk17
2.58 MB
clients-jdk8
2.51 MB
controller-jdk11
1.45 MB
controller-jdk17
1.45 MB
controller-jdk8
1.45 MB
integrations-jdk11
559 KB
integrations-jdk17
569 KB
integrations-jdk8
547 KB
internal-jdk11
3.26 MB
internal-jdk17
3.27 MB
internal-jdk8
3.24 MB
router-jdk11
1.05 MB
router-jdk17
1.04 MB
router-jdk8
1.03 MB
server-jdk11
9.14 MB
server-jdk8
8.77 MB