adding third and final later submission

dbcArchives/2024/PeerReviews/GroupProject12/PEER_REVIEW_12_09.md

@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+# Peer-review of ScaDaMaLe Student Group Project Number <XY>
+
+# Reviewer
+
+Choose one of the following option: 
+
+- Anonymous 
+
+
+This is a brief template to guide you through the peer-review process.
+It is meant to make recommendations for assigning between 0 and 10 points as a grade.
+This grade will be used to decide the *Best Group Project Prize*.
+
+Note that your feedback will be valuable to the course instructor, Raazesh Sainudiin (Raaz).
+But more crucially, it can help improve the presentation of the project so the group can take your suggestions to improve the final version that will be published by the end of the course in:
+
+- https://lamastex.github.io/ScaDaMaLe/
+
+IMPORTANT: The decision of whether a group project meets the minimal requirements to pass the course (this is just a Pass/Fail course) will be made by your instructor by taking your peer-review into account.
+
+# Set-up and Overview
+
+- Go to the public link for the Group Project repository that you have been assigned to for your peer-review.
+- You will be doing the peer-review constructively (You may clone the repository and try out codes yourself).
+- Recall/watch the live/video presentation and go through the repository according to the below guidelines.
+- You will be giving points under various categories and you have to report the final grade in the Course Canvas page.
+- Please attach the completed version of this template plain text markdown file `PEER_REVIEW.md` to  Canvas to complete the peer-review by the deadline.
+
+# 1. Live/Video Presentation
+
+Recall/watch the live/video presentation carefully and decide on a score between 0 and 2.
+
+Choose one of the following options:
+
+- 2 : The presentation was easily comprehensible and it helped me follow the project easily. I think I can definitely use the codes in the repository and adapt them if I were to encounter similar problems in the future, with possibly more in-depth self-study as needed.
+
+# 2. Structure of Project Repository
+
+The structure of the codes, including directory structure and coding/software-engineering practices,  were  
+
+Choose one of the following options:
+
+- 2 : Extremely organised and easily comprehensible and/or replicable.
+
+# 3. Comments and explanations in code:
+
+Choose one of the following options:
+
+- 2 : The code was well-commented so I could easily follow what was happening in most code blocks.
+
+# 4. Originality or Difficulty of the Project
+
+Choose one of the following options:
+
+
+- 2 : The project seems to have tackled a very challenging problem and has made significant contributions to aid other researchers or practitioners in a particular domain of expertise.
+
+# 5. Scalability of the Project
+
+Choose one of the following options:
+
+- 0 : The project is not at all scalable. There is no need to do this project in a distributed computing environment (explain in Section 8 below why you think so).  
+
+# 6. Total Grade
+
+Add up all the scores from the above 5 Categories and report it below.
+
+The Total Grade is: 8
+# 7. Completing Peer-review Process
+
+- Add this 8 as an integer to the LMS/Studium to complete your peer-review by the deadline.
+- Attach you completed version of this file `PEER_REVIEW.md` to the LMS to complete the peer-review by the deadline.
+
+# 8. Detailed Constructive Comments
+
+Please feel free to make detailed comments here in a constructive manner to help the group you are reviewing, so that they can make their presentation much better for the ScaDaMaLe-WASP Peer-reviewed Group Projects.
+
+
+
+

dbcArchives/2024/PeerReviews/GroupProject12/PEER_REVIEW_12_10.md

@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+# Peer-review of ScaDaMaLe Student Group Project Number <XY>
+
+# Reviewer
+
+Choose one of the following option: 
+
+- Anonymous 
+
+
+This is a brief template to guide you through the peer-review process.
+It is meant to make recommendations for assigning between 0 and 10 points as a grade.
+This grade will be used to decide the *Best Group Project Prize*.
+
+Note that your feedback will be valuable to the course instructor, Raazesh Sainudiin (Raaz).
+But more crucially, it can help improve the presentation of the project so the group can take your suggestions to improve the final version that will be published by the end of the course in:
+
+- https://lamastex.github.io/ScaDaMaLe/
+
+IMPORTANT: The decision of whether a group project meets the minimal requirements to pass the course (this is just a Pass/Fail course) will be made by your instructor by taking your peer-review into account.
+
+# Set-up and Overview
+
+- Go to the public link for the Group Project repository that you have been assigned to for your peer-review.
+- You will be doing the peer-review constructively (You may clone the repository and try out codes yourself).
+- Recall/watch the live/video presentation and go through the repository according to the below guidelines.
+- You will be giving points under various categories and you have to report the final grade in the Course Canvas page.
+- Please attach the completed version of this template plain text markdown file `PEER_REVIEW.md` to  Canvas to complete the peer-review by the deadline.
+
+# 1. Live/Video Presentation
+
+Recall/watch the live/video presentation carefully and decide on a score between 0 and 2.
+
+Choose one of the following options:
+
+- 2 : The presentation was easily comprehensible and it helped me follow the project easily. I think I can definitely use the codes in the repository and adapt them if I were to encounter similar problems in the future, with possibly more in-depth self-study as needed.
+
+# 2. Structure of Project Repository
+
+The structure of the codes, including directory structure and coding/software-engineering practices,  were  
+
+Choose one of the following options:
+
+- 2 : Extremely organised and easily comprehensible and/or replicable.
+
+# 3. Comments and explanations in code:
+
+Choose one of the following options:
+
+- 2 : The code was well-commented so I could easily follow what was happening in most code blocks.
+
+# 4. Originality or Difficulty of the Project
+
+Choose one of the following options:
+
+
+- 2 : The project seems to have tackled a very challenging problem and has made significant contributions to aid other researchers or practitioners in a particular domain of expertise.
+
+# 5. Scalability of the Project
+
+Choose one of the following options:
+
+- 0 : The project is not at all scalable. There is no need to do this project in a distributed computing environment (explain in Section 8 below why you think so).  
+
+# 6. Total Grade
+
+Add up all the scores from the above 5 Categories and report it below.
+
+The Total Grade is: 8
+# 7. Completing Peer-review Process
+
+- Add this 8 as an integer to the LMS/Studium to complete your peer-review by the deadline.
+- Attach you completed version of this file `PEER_REVIEW.md` to the LMS to complete the peer-review by the deadline.
+
+# 8. Detailed Constructive Comments
+
+Please feel free to make detailed comments here in a constructive manner to help the group you are reviewing, so that they can make their presentation much better for the ScaDaMaLe-WASP Peer-reviewed Group Projects.
+
+
+
+