-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 617
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: add missing labels to resources #2519
Changes from 1 commit
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,11 +1,15 @@ | ||
apiVersion: v1 | ||
apiVersion: v2 | ||
appVersion: v1.29.0 | ||
description: Openstack Cloud Controller Manager Helm Chart | ||
icon: https://object-storage-ca-ymq-1.vexxhost.net/swift/v1/6e4619c416ff4bd19e1c087f27a43eea/www-images-prod/openstack-logo/OpenStack-Logo-Vertical.png | ||
home: https://github.com/kubernetes/cloud-provider-openstack | ||
name: openstack-cloud-controller-manager | ||
version: 2.29.0 | ||
version: 2.29.0-1 | ||
maintainers: | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Is this correct? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I guess not, so maybe now? |
||
- name: eumel8 | ||
email: [email protected] | ||
cwrau marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
url: https://www.telekom.com | ||
dependencies: | ||
- name: common | ||
version: 2.14.1 | ||
repository: https://charts.bitnami.com/bitnami |
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -2,9 +2,8 @@ apiVersion: apps/v1 | |
kind: DaemonSet | ||
metadata: | ||
name: {{ include "occm.name" . }} | ||
labels: {{- include "common.labels.standard" . | nindent 4 }} | ||
namespace: {{ .Release.Namespace }} | ||
labels: | ||
{{- include "occm.labels" . | nindent 4 }} | ||
Comment on lines
-6
to
-7
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Will this give use the same labels here? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yes, this will result in the same labels There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I'm looking at CI results and I only see this label added to the DaemonSet:
See for yourself in the "Describe failed openstack-cloud-controller-manager" step: https://storage.googleapis.com/kubernetes-jenkins/pr-logs/pull/cloud-provider-openstack/2519/openstack-cloud-controller-manager-e2e-test/1749846521752326144/build-log.txt There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I don't know how CI comes up with that, but I would say it's technically impossible for this label to exist, neither in the old version nor my new one 😅 There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Okay, CI gets that from https://github.com/kubernetes/cloud-provider-openstack/blob/f7abe101ed041c8867d5fd1faa8351044f40a9cb/manifests/controller-manager/openstack-cloud-controller-manager-ds.yaml, so I guess we can disregard this. |
||
annotations: | ||
{{- with .Values.commonAnnotations }} | ||
{{- toYaml . | nindent 4 }} | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it's not something we want to change
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is needed for dependencies
And, why not? 🤔🤷
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok, I thought it's a dependency upgrade then no need to update the api version ..