-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
update troubleshooting + quickstart docs to aid with capi incompatibilities #32
Conversation
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ the `EXP_CLUSTER_RESOURCE_SET` is required if you want to deploy CNI using clust | |||
|
|||
Once you have access to a management cluster, you can initialize Cluster API with the following: | |||
``` | |||
clusterctl init --infrastructure proxmox --ipam in-cluster | |||
clusterctl init --infrastructure proxmox --ipam in-cluster --core cluster-api:v1.5.3 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@avorima
Do you agree with pinning the capi version in the quick-start docs?
while our compatibility versions matrix mentions that v1.6 not yet supported?
https://github.com/ionos-cloud/cluster-api-provider-proxmox/tree/main?tab=readme-ov-file#compatibility-with-cluster-api-and-kubernetes-versions
In my point of view we should plan the support for v1.6 very soon.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I mean, you can remove it when v1.6 support gets released. But as it is now, it's just a pain point for the end-user, having to figure out why it's not working as described. Especially when the errors you'll encounter tell you literally nothing about the incompatibility issue itself.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's wait for @avorima feedback.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, since those commands are meant to be copied into a terminal.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok then
e9e0fcc
to
35737e5
Compare
Quality Gate passedKudos, no new issues were introduced! 0 New issues |
No description provided.