-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 42
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Damage Plasticity Model #394
Conversation
Job Documentation on 6e45724 wanted to post the following: View the site here This comment will be updated on new commits. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just a few minor things
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, thanks! Just a few minor changes that need to be made in the documentation page.
Job Precheck on a8919b1 wanted to post the following: Your code requires style changes. A patch was auto generated and copied here
Alternatively, with your repository up to date and in the top level of your repository:
|
@vprithiv I just pushed an update that addresses the few minor remaining issues. Assuming the tests pass I'll merge this once they pass. |
ref #184
The initial implementation of the damaged plasticity model showed promise for modeling graphite tests but exhibited several discrepancies compared to behaviors documented in the literature (Lee and Fenves, 1998). This PR addresses these issues by thoroughly reviewing and comparing the BlackBear implementation with the published formulation and making necessary corrections and improvements.
Changes Made
These modifications have resulted in a more accurate and reliable model.