Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove obsolete fast_tls #274

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jan 20, 2025
Merged

Remove obsolete fast_tls #274

merged 7 commits into from
Jan 20, 2025

Conversation

NelsonVides
Copy link
Contributor

@NelsonVides NelsonVides commented Jan 8, 2025

Also implement tls-exporter channel binding for TLSv1.3.

@NelsonVides NelsonVides marked this pull request as ready for review January 8, 2025 12:47
@NelsonVides NelsonVides force-pushed the deps/fast_tls_removal branch 5 times, most recently from b5ba493 to 5b92b1a Compare January 9, 2025 11:42
@Neustradamus
Copy link

@NelsonVides: tls-unique and tls-server-end-point are supported too?

@NelsonVides
Copy link
Contributor Author

@NelsonVides: tls-unique and tls-server-end-point are supported too?

Not at the moment, tls-exporter is the best option so I prioritised only that one for now.

@Neustradamus
Copy link

Can you add tls-server-end-point for a best compatibility too?

Copy link
Contributor

@arcusfelis arcusfelis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok

@NelsonVides NelsonVides force-pushed the deps/fast_tls_removal branch from ceba826 to 805bd52 Compare January 20, 2025 14:16
Copy link
Contributor

@arcusfelis arcusfelis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

love it

@arcusfelis arcusfelis merged commit 82e7937 into master Jan 20, 2025
2 checks passed
@arcusfelis arcusfelis deleted the deps/fast_tls_removal branch January 20, 2025 16:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants