Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feature(agent): Knowledge add retriever name&desc getter and stter #2309

Conversation

cinjoseph
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Add the ability to retrieve the retriever's name and description in Knowledge, so that prompts referencing this knowledge can be more enriched.

How Has This Been Tested?

test by myself, config knowledge on dbgpt web and test whit a conversation to the agent

Snapshots:

Include snapshots for easier review.

Checklist:

  • [ * ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • [ * ] ] I have already rebased the commits and make the commit message conform to the project standard.
  • [ * ]] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • [ * ]] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • [ * ] ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • [ * ] ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

@github-actions github-actions bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 20, 2025
@cinjoseph
Copy link
Contributor Author

@fangyinc

Copy link
Collaborator

@Aries-ckt Aries-ckt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

r+

Copy link
Collaborator

@csunny csunny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

r+

@csunny csunny merged commit 8bb2a15 into eosphoros-ai:main Jan 23, 2025
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants