-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(backend): add distribution queue #33
Conversation
Warning Rate limit exceeded@jo-elimu has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 21 minutes and 15 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe updates introduce a Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Owner
participant AttestationHandler
participant Distributor
participant DistributionQueueContract
Owner->>+DistributionQueueContract: updateOwner(newOwner)
DistributionQueueContract-->>-Owner: emit OwnerUpdated
Owner->>+DistributionQueueContract: updateAttestationHandler(newAttestationHandler)
DistributionQueueContract-->>-Owner: emit AttestationHandlerUpdated
Distributor->>+DistributionQueueContract: addDistribution()
DistributionQueueContract-->>-Distributor: emit DistributionAdded
AttestationHandler->>+DistributionQueueContract: updateDistributionStatus(queueIndex, newStatus)
DistributionQueueContract-->>-AttestationHandler: emit DistributionStatusUpdated
Tip Early access features: enabledWe are currently testing the following features in early access:
Note:
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for web3-sponsors canceled.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
modifier onlyOwner() { | ||
if (msg.sender != owner) { | ||
revert OnlyOwner(); | ||
} | ||
_; | ||
} | ||
|
||
modifier onlyAttestationHandler() { | ||
if (msg.sender != owner) { | ||
revert OnlyAttestationHandler(); | ||
} | ||
_; | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fix the address check in onlyAttestationHandler
modifier.
The onlyAttestationHandler
modifier should check attestationHandler
instead of owner
.
- if (msg.sender != owner) {
+ if (msg.sender != attestationHandler) {
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
modifier onlyOwner() { | |
if (msg.sender != owner) { | |
revert OnlyOwner(); | |
} | |
_; | |
} | |
modifier onlyAttestationHandler() { | |
if (msg.sender != owner) { | |
revert OnlyAttestationHandler(); | |
} | |
_; | |
} | |
modifier onlyOwner() { | |
if (msg.sender != owner) { | |
revert OnlyOwner(); | |
} | |
_; | |
} | |
modifier onlyAttestationHandler() { | |
if (msg.sender != attestationHandler) { | |
revert OnlyAttestationHandler(); | |
} | |
_; | |
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
backend/contracts/DistributionQueue.sol (1)
1-3
: Specify the license identifier.It's a good practice to specify the SPDX license identifier for clarity.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT pragma solidity ^0.8.24;
function updateDistributionStatus(uint256 queueIndex, DistributionStatus _distributionStatus) public onlyAttestationHandler() { | ||
Distribution memory distribution = queue[queueIndex]; | ||
distribution.status = _distributionStatus; | ||
emit DistributionStatusUpdated(distribution); | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fix the distribution update logic.
The updateDistributionStatus
function updates a local copy of the distribution instead of the original one in the queue.
- Distribution memory distribution = queue[queueIndex];
- distribution.status = _distributionStatus;
- emit DistributionStatusUpdated(distribution);
+ queue[queueIndex].status = _distributionStatus;
+ emit DistributionStatusUpdated(queue[queueIndex]);
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
function updateDistributionStatus(uint256 queueIndex, DistributionStatus _distributionStatus) public onlyAttestationHandler() { | |
Distribution memory distribution = queue[queueIndex]; | |
distribution.status = _distributionStatus; | |
emit DistributionStatusUpdated(distribution); | |
} | |
function updateDistributionStatus(uint256 queueIndex, DistributionStatus _distributionStatus) public onlyAttestationHandler() { | |
queue[queueIndex].status = _distributionStatus; | |
emit DistributionStatusUpdated(queue[queueIndex]); | |
} |
event OwnerUpdated(address owner); | ||
event AttestationHandlerUpdated(address attestationHandler); | ||
event DistributionAdded(Distribution distribution); | ||
event DistributionStatusUpdated(Distribution distribution); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider including old and new values in events.
For better traceability, the OwnerUpdated
and AttestationHandlerUpdated
events can include both old and new values.
- event OwnerUpdated(address owner);
- event AttestationHandlerUpdated(address attestationHandler);
+ event OwnerUpdated(address indexed previousOwner, address indexed newOwner);
+ event AttestationHandlerUpdated(address indexed previousHandler, address indexed newHandler);
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
event OwnerUpdated(address owner); | |
event AttestationHandlerUpdated(address attestationHandler); | |
event DistributionAdded(Distribution distribution); | |
event DistributionStatusUpdated(Distribution distribution); | |
event OwnerUpdated(address indexed previousOwner, address indexed newOwner); | |
event AttestationHandlerUpdated(address indexed previousHandler, address indexed newHandler); | |
event DistributionAdded(Distribution distribution); | |
event DistributionStatusUpdated(Distribution distribution); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What is indexed
for?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jo-elimu The indexed
keyword in Solidity is used in event definitions to make the event parameters searchable. When an event is emitted, the parameters that are marked as indexed
can be used to filter and search for specific events in the transaction logs. Each event can have up to three indexed
parameters. This is particularly useful for querying historical events and analyzing blockchain data.
In the context of your events, using indexed
would allow you to search for events by the previous and new owner or attestation handler, making it easier to trace changes over time.
Here is the updated event definition with indexed
parameters:
event OwnerUpdated(address indexed previousOwner, address indexed newOwner);
event AttestationHandlerUpdated(address indexed previousHandler, address indexed newHandler);
This means you can now filter and search for these events based on the previousOwner
, newOwner
, previousHandler
, and newHandler
values.
Let me know if you have any more questions!
Learnings added
Learnt from: jo-elimu
PR: elimu-ai/web3-sponsors#33
File: backend/contracts/DistributionQueue.sol:22-25
Timestamp: 2024-06-30T19:35:54.619Z
Learning: The `indexed` keyword in Solidity event definitions is used to make event parameters searchable, allowing for efficient querying and filtering of events in transaction logs.
Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.
refs #13