Rebuilt docs 2024-11-20

docs/analysis/data-quality-report/index.html

@@ -14624,7 +14624,7 @@ <h1 id="Provision-data-quality-report">Provision data quality report<a class="an
 </div><div class="jp-RenderedHTMLCommon jp-RenderedMarkdown jp-MarkdownOutput " data-mime-type="text/markdown">
 <h3 id="Data-quality-framework">Data quality framework<a class="anchor-link" href="#Data-quality-framework">&#182;</a></h3><p>The table below visualises the framework that is used to assign a quality level to each ODP data provision.</p>
 <p>The criteria marked as &quot;true&quot; at each level must be met by a data provision in order for it to be scored at that level. The levels are cumulative, so all criteria must be met in order for a provision to be scored as <em>data that is trustworthy</em>. Where we have data from alternative providers (e.g. Historic England conservation-area data) the first criteria cannot be met so it is scored as the first quality level, <em>some data</em>.</p>
-<p><img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/digital-land/digital-land.github.io/refs/heads/main/docs/images/diagrams/quality-framework-table.png" alt="quality framework table" /></p>
+<p><img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/digital-land/digital-land.github.io/refs/heads/main/static/images/diagrams/quality-framework-table.png" alt="quality framework table" /></p>
 
 </div>
 </div>