Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: remove mock #5265

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 9, 2025
Merged

feat: remove mock #5265

merged 3 commits into from
Jan 9, 2025

Conversation

anxolin
Copy link
Contributor

@anxolin anxolin commented Jan 1, 2025

Summary

We are not mantaining or using the local API mock and is messing up with the TS support and adding indirection when debugging the API usage.

My IDE didn't like how we implemented the mock either, making the "go to references" to behave not so well:
image

This PR kills this logic, as I don't think adds any value right now

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 1, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Updated (UTC)
cosmos 🔄 Building (Inspect) Visit Preview Jan 9, 2025 2:37pm
cowfi 🔄 Building (Inspect) Visit Preview Jan 9, 2025 2:37pm
explorer-dev 🔄 Building (Inspect) Visit Preview Jan 9, 2025 2:37pm
sdk-tools 🔄 Building (Inspect) Visit Preview Jan 9, 2025 2:37pm
swap-dev 🔄 Building (Inspect) Visit Preview Jan 9, 2025 2:37pm
widget-configurator 🔄 Building (Inspect) Visit Preview Jan 9, 2025 2:37pm

Copy link
Collaborator

@alfetopito alfetopito left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🔪

@anxolin anxolin merged commit a5ce229 into develop Jan 9, 2025
5 of 11 checks passed
@anxolin anxolin deleted the remove_api_mock branch January 9, 2025 14:40
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 9, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants