-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 374
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Checks Added #2020
Checks Added #2020
Conversation
@Ansh101112 is attempting to deploy a commit to the Vivek Prajapati's projects Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
WalkthroughThe changes primarily focus on enhancing the structure and functionality of the API and the user interface. The routing configuration is updated to include versioning for better maintainability, while the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant VigyForm
participant API
User->>VigyForm: Submit Form
VigyForm->>API: Send Data to /api/v1/vigy_form
API-->>VigyForm: Response (Success/Failure)
VigyForm->>User: Show Response (Alert)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
backend/index.js (1)
45-45
: Ensure all routes use the new versioned path.The old routes
"/api"
are still in use forroutes
andpasswordResetRoutes
. To maintain consistency and follow best practices for API versioning, update these routes to use the versioned path"/api/v1"
.
- Update
app.use("/api", routes);
toapp.use("/api/v1", routes);
- Update
app.use("/api", passwordResetRoutes);
toapp.use("/api/v1", passwordResetRoutes);
Analysis chain
LGTM! But verify the usage of the new route.
The change to use a versioned path for
adminRegistrationRoutes
is approved. This is a good practice for API versioning.However, ensure that all references to the old route are updated to use the new versioned path.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all references to the old route and ensure they are updated to use the new versioned path. # Test: Search for the old route. Expect: No occurrences of the old route. rg --type js -A 5 $'"/api"'Length of output: 349
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if `routes` and `passwordResetRoutes` should be updated to use the new versioned path. # Search for the definition and usage of `routes` rg --type js 'routes' # Search for the definition and usage of `passwordResetRoutes` rg --type js 'passwordResetRoutes'Length of output: 895
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- backend/index.js (1 hunks)
- src/Admin/Pages/VigyForm.css (1 hunks)
- src/Admin/Pages/VigyForm.jsx (5 hunks)
- src/User/pages/Admin-Verification/Admin.jsx (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- src/Admin/Pages/VigyForm.css
- src/User/pages/Admin-Verification/Admin.jsx
Additional comments not posted (6)
src/Admin/Pages/VigyForm.jsx (6)
6-8
: LGTM!The import statements for
Swal
,axios
, andClipLoader
are necessary for the added functionality.
18-18
: LGTM!The addition of the
loading
state variable is appropriate for managing the loading state during form submission.
297-345
: LGTM!The updates to the
handleSubmit
function for managing the loading state and handling form submission to the new endpoint are appropriate.
448-457
: LGTM!The updates to the form rendering logic for handling the loading state and displaying a loader during form submission are appropriate.
322-322
: LGTM!The update to the form submission endpoint to use a production-ready URL is appropriate.
1-1
: LGTM!The stylistic changes, including normalization of string quotes and minor layout adjustments, improve readability and maintainability of the code.
Also applies to: 10-10, 21-25, 29-35, 46-72, 75-75, 79-89, 96-133, 140-172, 176-231, 235-266, 271-286, 296-296, 350-469
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
all test are working fine but anything will not be work properly then will revert it. |
sure sir well I have also tested it locally then only I have raised pr only. Hope it will works fine. |
Congratulations, Your pull request has been successfully merged 🥳🎉 Thank you for your contribution to the project 🚀 Keep Contributing!! ✨ |
Fixes Issue
Close #2019
Changes proposed
Screenshots
Note to reviewers
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
.vigy-form
component to enhance user experience and readability.Style
Chores