Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency lxml to v5.2.1 #546

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 9, 2024
Merged

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Apr 12, 2024

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
lxml (source, changelog) ==5.1.0 -> ==5.2.1 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

lxml/lxml (lxml)

v5.2.1

Compare Source

==================

Bugs fixed

  • LP#2059910: The minimum CPU architecture for the Linux x86 binary wheels was set back to
    "core2", but with SSE 4.2 enabled.

  • LP#2059977: Element.iterfind("//absolute_path") failed with a SyntaxError
    where it should have issued a warning.

  • GH#416: The documentation build was using the non-standard which command.
    Patch by Michał Górny.

v5.2.0

Compare Source

==================

Other changes

  • LP#1958539: The lxml.html.clean implementation suffered from several (only if used)
    security issues in the past and was now extracted into a separate library:

    https://github.com/fedora-python/lxml_html_clean

    Projects that use lxml without "lxml.html.clean" will not notice any difference,
    except that they won't have potentially vulnerable code installed.
    The module is available as an "extra" setuptools dependency "lxml[html_clean]",
    so that Projects that need "lxml.html.clean" will need to switch their requirements
    from "lxml" to "lxml[html_clean]", or install the new library themselves.

  • The minimum CPU architecture for the Linux x86 binary wheels was upgraded to
    "sandybridge" (launched 2011), and glibc 2.28 / gcc 12 (manylinux_2_28) wheels were added.

  • Built with Cython 3.0.10.

v5.1.1

Compare Source

==================

Bugs fixed

  • LP#2048920: iterlinks() in lxml.html rejected bytes input in 5.1.0.

  • High source line numbers from the parser are no longer truncated
    (up to a C long) when using libxml2 2.11 or later.

Other changes

  • GH#407: A compatibility test was adapted to recent expat versions.
    Patch by Miro Hrončok.

  • Binary wheels use the library versions libxml2 2.12.6 and libxslt 1.1.39.

  • Windows binary wheels use the library versions libxml2 2.11.7 and libxslt 1.1.39.

  • Built with Cython 3.0.9.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "every weekend" in timezone Etc/UTC, Automerge - "every weekend" in timezone Etc/UTC.

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/lxml-5.x branch 5 times, most recently from a77506f to 4888d39 Compare April 17, 2024 12:05
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/lxml-5.x branch from 4888d39 to a647816 Compare April 18, 2024 16:32
@lengau lengau requested review from tigarmo and cjdcordeiro April 19, 2024 23:14
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/lxml-5.x branch 2 times, most recently from dfeb118 to 69c2ccd Compare April 23, 2024 16:33
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/lxml-5.x branch from 69c2ccd to d951265 Compare April 30, 2024 18:22
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/lxml-5.x branch from d951265 to f136893 Compare May 9, 2024 14:32
@tigarmo tigarmo merged commit e4d63c4 into main May 9, 2024
13 checks passed
@tigarmo tigarmo deleted the renovate/lxml-5.x branch May 9, 2024 21:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants