Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Release 1.30-moonray] Update to arm64 versions of the same images #746

Conversation

addyess
Copy link
Contributor

@addyess addyess commented Oct 17, 2024

Overview

Use multiarch versions of these images so that one can bootstrap from 1.30-moonray track

@addyess addyess requested a review from a team as a code owner October 17, 2024 21:50
@addyess
Copy link
Contributor Author

addyess commented Oct 17, 2024

Similar to #745

@addyess addyess changed the title Update to arm64 versions of the same images [Release 1.30-moonray] Update to arm64 versions of the same images Oct 17, 2024
Copy link
Member

@mateoflorido mateoflorido left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

Copy link
Contributor

@bschimke95 bschimke95 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@bschimke95
Copy link
Contributor

Huh, the moonray build fails: https://github.com/canonical/k8s-snap/actions/runs/11393602184/job/31794769325?pr=746

Seems unrelated to your PR, though.

@addyess
Copy link
Contributor Author

addyess commented Oct 21, 2024

i think it's trying to add the moonray patch to an already patched branch. This branch is a delicate one

@addyess addyess merged commit 3a15336 into archive/release-1.30-moonray Oct 21, 2024
13 of 16 checks passed
@addyess addyess deleted the KU-1799/release-1.30-moonray/support-arm64 branch October 21, 2024 17:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants