Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ads] Followup to "Send HTTP response status for landed events as part of the confirmation token redemption" #36752 #25523

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Oct 15, 2024

Conversation

tmancey
Copy link
Collaborator

@tmancey tmancey commented Sep 11, 2024

Resolves brave/brave-browser#40991

Submitter Checklist:

  • I confirm that no security/privacy review is needed and no other type of reviews are needed, or that I have requested them
  • There is a ticket for my issue
  • Used Github auto-closing keywords in the PR description above
  • Wrote a good PR/commit description
  • Squashed any review feedback or "fixup" commits before merge, so that history is a record of what happened in the repo, not your PR
  • Added appropriate labels (QA/Yes or QA/No; release-notes/include or release-notes/exclude; OS/...) to the associated issue
  • Checked the PR locally:
    • npm run test -- brave_browser_tests, npm run test -- brave_unit_tests wiki
    • npm run presubmit wiki, npm run gn_check, npm run tslint
  • Ran git rebase master (if needed)

Reviewer Checklist:

  • A security review is not needed, or a link to one is included in the PR description
  • New files have MPL-2.0 license header
  • Adequate test coverage exists to prevent regressions
  • Major classes, functions and non-trivial code blocks are well-commented
  • Changes in component dependencies are properly reflected in gn
  • Code follows the style guide
  • Test plan is specified in PR before merging

After-merge Checklist:

Test Plan:

Verify that the HTTP response status codes 400, 401, 403, 404, 407, 408, 429, 451, 500, 502, 503, and 504 are included in the confirmation token redemption payload as "httpResponseStatus": "###" for Rewards users (e.g., "httpResponseStatus": "503"). For any unlisted status codes, the response should only reflect the status code class (e.g., 1xx, 2xx, 3xx, 4xx, 5xx). The "httpResponseStatus" key should NOT be included for non-Rewards users.

@tmancey
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tmancey commented Sep 11, 2024

Privacy review discussion https://github.com/brave/reviews/issues/1553, thanks. cc @fmarier

@tmancey tmancey force-pushed the issues/40991 branch 2 times, most recently from eaf85f0 to 8bba718 Compare September 11, 2024 14:06
@tmancey tmancey force-pushed the issues/40991 branch 2 times, most recently from 844c115 to c260255 Compare September 12, 2024 08:28
@tmancey tmancey marked this pull request as draft September 12, 2024 09:13
@tmancey tmancey force-pushed the issues/40991 branch 10 times, most recently from 634cf31 to c036f23 Compare September 16, 2024 08:25
bool IsErrorPage(content::NavigationHandle* navigation_handle);
// NOTE: DO NOT use this method before the navigation commit as it will return
// null. It is safe to use from `WebContentsObserver::DidFinishNavigation()`.
std::optional<int> HttpStatusCode(
Copy link
Contributor

@boocmp boocmp Oct 15, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This one is used only in DidFinishNavigation if I'm right. I'd prefer to remove such a context dependent method in favor of the lambda function in DidFinishNavigation

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks. We have a comment in the header:

  // NOTE: DO NOT use this method before the navigation commit as it will return
  // null. It is safe to use from `WebContentsObserver::DidFinishNavigation()`.
  std::optional<int> HttpStatusCode(

@tmancey tmancey force-pushed the issues/40991 branch 3 times, most recently from a6096fc to 8aa6b3b Compare October 15, 2024 15:42
@tmancey tmancey requested a review from boocmp October 15, 2024 16:09
@tmancey tmancey force-pushed the issues/40991 branch 2 times, most recently from 27c5e3c to e7dfcf3 Compare October 15, 2024 16:16
Copy link
Collaborator

@ShivanKaul ShivanKaul left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

privacy lgtm

run_loop_.Run();
}

///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: Is this needed?

Suggested change
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@fmarier this is expected because I break up public/private sections using this divider. Thanks

@tmancey tmancey merged commit cdfe99b into master Oct 15, 2024
17 checks passed
@tmancey tmancey deleted the issues/40991 branch October 15, 2024 22:34
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 1.73.x - Nightly milestone Oct 15, 2024
@brave-builds
Copy link
Collaborator

Released in v1.73.14

@bsclifton bsclifton modified the milestones: 1.73.x - Nightly, 1.74.x - Nightly Nov 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet