Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

add liveliness and readiness support for dag server #554

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jan 13, 2025
Merged

add liveliness and readiness support for dag server #554

merged 7 commits into from
Jan 13, 2025
+75 −3

Conversation

pgvishnuram
Copy link
Contributor

@pgvishnuram pgvishnuram commented Jan 13, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Description

add liveliness and readiness support for dag server

Related Issues

Testing

QA should able to validate platform passed readiness and liveliness probe from astronomer values

Merging

cherry-pick to master and release-1.13

@pgvishnuram pgvishnuram marked this pull request as ready for review January 13, 2025 13:39
@pgvishnuram pgvishnuram requested a review from a team as a code owner January 13, 2025 13:39
danielhoherd
danielhoherd approved these changes Jan 13, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@danielhoherd danielhoherd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. I'm happy that we're being consistent between astronomer/astronomer and astronomer/airflow-chart.

@pgvishnuram pgvishnuram merged commit 4f56d88 into master Jan 13, 2025
11 of 12 checks passed
@pgvishnuram pgvishnuram deleted the feat/add-probes-for-dagserver branch January 13, 2025 16:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@rishkarajgi rishkarajgi rishkarajgi approved these changes

@danielhoherd danielhoherd danielhoherd approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@pgvishnuram @danielhoherd @rishkarajgi