Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Search custom fields with multiple type of values #5559

Merged

Conversation

frascuchon
Copy link
Member

Description

This PR reviews and fixes the custom field search when multiple value types are stored ({ "a": "string", b: 100, c: 10.0})

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

How Has This Been Tested

Checklist

  • I added relevant documentation
  • I followed the style guidelines of this project
  • I did a self-review of my code
  • I made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I confirm My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have added relevant notes to the CHANGELOG.md file (See https://keepachangelog.com/)

jfcalvo and others added 30 commits July 19, 2024 16:30
…ine (#5355)

# Description
<!-- Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue.
Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any
dependencies that are required for this change. -->

This PR adds support to indexing datasets and records with image fields.

Note: A datasets reindex is required with this change.

**Type of change**
<!-- Please delete options that are not relevant. Remember to title the
PR according to the type of change -->

- New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

**How Has This Been Tested**
<!-- Please add some reference about how your feature has been tested.
-->

**Checklist**
<!-- Please go over the list and make sure you've taken everything into
account -->

- I added relevant documentation
- I followed the style guidelines of this project
- I did a self-review of my code
- I made corresponding changes to the documentation
- I confirm My changes generate no new warnings
- I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature
works
- I have added relevant notes to the CHANGELOG.md file (See
https://keepachangelog.com/)
# Description
<!-- Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue.
Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any
dependencies that are required for this change. -->

This PR adds support to work with image fields using the SDK. 

## TODO (as separate PRs)

- [ ] Add documentation section
- [ ] Verify behavior using from/to_hub methods
- [ ] Add tooling to read data URLs from image files/folders (based on
logic defined in `image_to_html`)
- [ ] Add some media type validation (supported image types) 
- [ ] [Optional] Add tooling to re-scale images. The lower the image
sizes, the better the UI work. We can define a transparent re-scaling
process to support large images (currently the limit size in the backend
is 5MB for data URL)


**Type of change**
<!-- Please delete options that are not relevant. Remember to title the
PR according to the type of change -->

- New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

**How Has This Been Tested**
<!-- Please add some reference about how your feature has been tested.
-->

**Checklist**
<!-- Please go over the list and make sure you've taken everything into
account -->

- I added relevant documentation
- I followed the style guidelines of this project
- I did a self-review of my code
- I made corresponding changes to the documentation
- I confirm My changes generate no new warnings
- I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature
works
- I have added relevant notes to the CHANGELOG.md file (See
https://keepachangelog.com/)

---------

Co-authored-by: José Francisco Calvo <[email protected]>
@frascuchon frascuchon requested a review from jfcalvo October 2, 2024 12:07
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 2, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.26%. Comparing base (d37566c) to head (95550e3).
Report is 1 commits behind head on releases/2.3.0.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                Coverage Diff                 @@
##           releases/2.3.0    #5559      +/-   ##
==================================================
+ Coverage           91.25%   91.26%   +0.01%     
==================================================
  Files                 145      145              
  Lines                6015     6025      +10     
==================================================
+ Hits                 5489     5499      +10     
  Misses                526      526              
Flag Coverage Δ
argilla-server 91.26% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Base automatically changed from feat/custom-field-support to develop October 2, 2024 12:14
@frascuchon frascuchon changed the base branch from develop to releases/2.3.0 October 2, 2024 12:20
@frascuchon frascuchon merged commit 7549a45 into releases/2.3.0 Oct 2, 2024
5 of 6 checks passed
@frascuchon frascuchon deleted the bugfix/search-on-custom-with-multiple-value-types branch October 2, 2024 14:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants