Change formatter to align parameters in method declaration

[bziobrowski]

PR changes IJ formatter to align multiline method declaration parameters.
Current settings make multi-parameter declarations hard to read because everything is crammed into as few lines as possible.
With alignment enabled, declaration such as :

public MultistageGroupByExecutor(int[] groupKeyIds, AggregationFunction[] aggFunctions, int[] filterArgIds,
      int maxFilterArgId, AggType aggType, boolean leafReturnFinalResult, DataSchema resultSchema,
      Map<String, String> opChainMetadata, @Nullable PlanNode.NodeHint nodeHint) {

can be reformatted as

public MultistageGroupByExecutor(int[] groupKeyIds,
                                 AggregationFunction[] aggFunctions,
                                 int[] filterArgIds,
                                 int maxFilterArgId, AggType aggType,
                                 boolean leafReturnFinalResult,
                                 DataSchema resultSchema,
                                 Map<String, String> opChainMetadata,
                                 @Nullable PlanNode.NodeHint nodeHint) {

or

public MultistageGroupByExecutor(
      int[] groupKeyIds,
      AggregationFunction[] aggFunctions,
      int[] filterArgIds,
      int maxFilterArgId, AggType aggType,
      boolean leafReturnFinalResult,
      DataSchema resultSchema,
      Map<String, String> opChainMetadata,
      @Nullable PlanNode.NodeHint nodeHint) {

or differently - with multiple parameters per line - but with first parameter always aligned.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 63.83%. Comparing base (59551e4) to head (0b7bfe4).
Report is 1557 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master   #14783      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     61.75%   63.83%   +2.08%     
- Complexity      207     1611    +1404     
============================================
  Files          2436     2704     +268     
  Lines        133233   150977   +17744     
  Branches      20636    23320    +2684     
============================================
+ Hits          82274    96378   +14104     
- Misses        44911    47381    +2470     
- Partials       6048     7218    +1170     

Flag	Coverage Δ
custom-integration1	100.00% <ø> (+99.99%)	⬆️
integration	100.00% <ø> (+99.99%)	⬆️
integration1	100.00% <ø> (+99.99%)	⬆️
integration2	0.00% <ø> (ø)
java-11	56.24% <ø> (-5.47%)	⬇️
java-21	63.73% <ø> (+2.11%)	⬆️
skip-bytebuffers-false	63.82% <ø> (+2.08%)	⬆️
skip-bytebuffers-true	63.71% <ø> (+35.98%)	⬆️
temurin	63.83% <ø> (+2.08%)	⬆️
unittests	63.83% <ø> (+2.08%)	⬆️
unittests1	56.27% <ø> (+9.38%)	⬆️
unittests2	34.12% <ø> (+6.39%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[Jackie-Jiang]

This is huge change which can potentially cause changes for every single method, and make PRs very hard to review. The current style setting honors line breaks, so if you strongly prefer the new format, it should allows you to do that (i.e. IDE reformat won't change it).
Let's not change the style sheet because this change has too high impact, and it is personal preference.

[bziobrowski]

Hmm, it actually is possible to split long param list into multiple lines now.
That wasn't allowed the last time I checked.
I'm ok with closing the PR then.