Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

STaaS Troubleshooting #4105

Open
wants to merge 10 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

STaaS Troubleshooting #4105

wants to merge 10 commits into from

Conversation

EdithLansens
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@EdithLansens EdithLansens requested a review from a team as a code owner January 6, 2025 09:43
Copy link
Member Author

@EdithLansens EdithLansens left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@robin-devos-skyline, as per your request via email, we’ve created a new "Troubleshooting - STaaS" page based on the Word document you provided. Could you please carefully review this pull request and go over my comments?

> [!TIP]
> For more information, refer to [Skyline DataMiner Core InterAppCalls Range 1.0.1.1](xref:Skyline_DataMiner_Core_InterAppCalls_Range_1.0#1011).

DataMiner Systems may experience performance issues because of the high number of interactions when using SLNet Subscriptions for specific actions. In DataMiner 10.3.12, improvements were made to increase the efficiency of these interactions, with further enhancements added in DataMiner 10.4.6.
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not entirely sure if I interpreted the section above correctly. It was structured and worded differently in the original document, but I made some adjustments for the sake of clarity. Could you double-check if the content is still accurate, @robin-devos-skyline?

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@FalconeDanielle could you assist with the above?

Copy link
Member

@robin-devos-skyline robin-devos-skyline Jan 10, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would adjust lines 244-249 as follows:
"- If the DataMiner System uses many inter-element or inter-automation communication, then the usage of the InterApp framework is a good architectural choice.
If the DataMiner System experiences SLNet performance issues because of the large interactions when using SLNet Subscriptions. Make sure you have DataMiner v10.3.12/v10.4.6 or higher, as the efficiency of InterApp communication has improved greatly. This also directly impacts the interactions towards STaaS.

Tip

For more information, refer to Skyline DataMiner Core InterAppCalls Range 1.0.1.1."

Context: the InterApp class was introduced in v10.1, which used SLNet as a communication layer. As of v10.3.12/10.4.6, this communication layer has moved to a message broker. This also reduces the interactions towards STaaS (=extra load + extra costs)
(Note - I found the backbone of InterApp difficult to understand, as I could only find bits and pieces in the documentation, then link it to a specific use case)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants