Added recipe for drawing graphs

docs/manual/source/Examples.rst

@@ -40,6 +40,8 @@ Examples displaying several functionalities:
 
 * `How to compare theory predictions with experimental limits <compareUL.html>`_ (download the Python code :download:`here <recipes/compareUL.py>`, IPython notebook :download:`here <recipes/compareUL.ipynb>`)
 
+* `How to draw SMS graphs <drawingGraphs.html>`_ (download the Python code :download:`here <recipes/drawingGraphs.py>`, IPython notebook :download:`here <recipes/drawingGraphs.ipynb>`)
+
 * `How to use a LHE input including width information <lheLLPExample.html>`_ (download the Python code :download:`here <recipes/lheLLPExample.py>`, IPython notebook :download:`here <recipes/lheLLPExample.ipynb>`)
 
 * `How to compute the likelihood and chi2 for a theory predictions <compute_likelihood.html>`_ (download the Python code :download:`here <recipes/compute_likelihood.py>`, IPython notebook :download:`here <recipes/compute_likelihood.ipynb>`)

docs/manual/source/TheoryPredictions.rst

@@ -76,13 +76,13 @@ The procedure compares the root nodes, which in this example have the same canon
 Hence criteria 1. and 2. for matching two nodes are satisfied. 
 
 
-The next step consists in comparing the root nodes daughters *irrespective of their order*. In this example these are (gluino, N1) from the model topology and (MET,anyBSM) from the database topology, as shown by. Once again we compare their canonical names and particle properties (*Step B* in :numref:`Fig. %s <matchB>`).
+The next step consists in comparing the root nodes daughters *irrespective of their order*. In this example these are (gluino, N1) from the model topology and (MET,anyBSM) from the database topology, as shown by. Once again we compare their canonical names and particle properties (*Step 1* in :numref:`Fig. %s <matchB>`).
 Note that although the particle properties of N1 and anyBSM match, their canonical names are different, hence we only have the following partial matches:
 
  * gluino :math:`\leftrightarrow` anyBSM
  * N1 :math:`\leftrightarrow` MET
 
-In order to fully match the gluino and anyBSM nodes their daughters must also be compared (*Step C*). Since their daughters (q,N1) and (MET,jet) are final state nodes (undecayed) the comparison procedure stops at this level and results in the following matches:
+In order to fully match the gluino and anyBSM nodes their daughters must also be compared (*Step 2*). Since their daughters (q,N1) and (MET,jet) are final state nodes (undecayed) the comparison procedure stops at this level and results in the following matches:
 
  * q :math:`\leftrightarrow` jet
  * N1 :math:`\leftrightarrow` MET