Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GitHub Actions: Run pre-commit #74
GitHub Actions: Run pre-commit #74
Changes from 2 commits
d125d05
9357cd0
494c4b8
ee5b632
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a problem: when I run
pre-commit run --all-files
on my machine, or isort directly, this change gets undone.The problem is that soundswallower is an internal module, and therefore there's a space between third party import (numpy) and internal imports, but pre-commit-action is not recognizing that here, it's lumping soundswallower with the third party imports.
Maybe a
pip install -e .
is required first?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK... Let's try that. There is also the idea of
isort known-first-party
in the config but I like your idea more.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I suppose for just running isort, it's silly to install everything.
I was going to vote against known-first-party because I think isort ought to be able to figure it out, but for performance reasons I have changed my mind.