Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[17.0][WIP][MIG] connector_jira_servicedesk: Migration to 17.0 #109

Draft
wants to merge 24 commits into
base: 17.0
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

SilvioC2C
Copy link

@SilvioC2C SilvioC2C commented Jul 9, 2024

Migration based on top of #108

@SilvioC2C SilvioC2C force-pushed the 17.0-mig-connector_jira_servicedesk branch 4 times, most recently from 13ba34c to 116149e Compare July 10, 2024 09:58
p-tombez and others added 23 commits July 11, 2024 15:48
Map projects by external_id + set of jira orgs

Project bindings now can be assigned to one or more jira organizations.
The binding for the project accept an additional argument for
organizations. A task will be linked with the project having the exact
same set of organizations that it has, or fallback to a project without
organization.

A constraint ensures that you cannot have several projects with the same
set of organizations or 2 projects without organization.

The link wizard has a new step to select the organization.

The REST API for Serviced Desk is a different one.

The former code was based on pycontribs/jira#388
which is closed and unmaintained. We only need to read the organizations
from the servicedesk REST API and the local code is minimal.

We can now use the normal jira library.
We should be able to have 2 bindings without external_id (not yet
exported)
The unicity constraint (backend_id, odoo_id) on jira.backend.backend is
relaxed: it now allows one binding of each type.
The reason for this is:

* supporting several projects of different types is a requirements (eg.
  1 service desk and 1 software)
* but if we implement new features like "if I create a task it is
  pushed to Jira", with different projects we would not know where to
  push them

Using this constraint, we'll be able to focus new export features by
project type.
The constraint did not look for inactive projects, which
makes the import fail later because it finds several projects
for the same task.
When a record does not exist on Jira:

* the job is done instead of failed
* a result on the job tells about the missing record
* the binding is deleted on Odoo
* for worklogs, the analytic line is deleted as well
We can compare the millisecond dates on both sides to see if any changes
has been done on Jira and avoid useless writes.  Previously, we were
using the 'sync_date' field, which works too but will make more sync
than necessary (because the sync happens after the last jira's
updated_at value).

Fortuitously, the updated_at is also very useful for debugging purposes.
The pagination specs of the servicedesk API are not the same than the
Jira API (respectively isLastPage vs lastPage). So the lib's
_fetch_pages does not fetch all the pages.

Optimize the requests: we get all the data at the initial call, so
the records are passed directly to "import_record" which will not do
another request.
Update connector_jira_servicedesk/models/account_analytic_line/common.py

Co-authored-by: Stéphane Mangin <[email protected]>

Update connector_jira_servicedesk/tests/test_import_organization.py

Co-authored-by: Stéphane Mangin <[email protected]>

Update connector_jira_servicedesk/tests/common.py

Co-authored-by: Stéphane Mangin <[email protected]>

Update connector_jira_servicedesk/i18n/connector_jira_servicedesk.pot

Co-authored-by: Stéphane Mangin <[email protected]>

Update connector_jira_servicedesk/models/account_analytic_line/importer.py

Co-authored-by: Stéphane Mangin <[email protected]>
@SilvioC2C SilvioC2C force-pushed the 17.0-mig-connector_jira_servicedesk branch from 116149e to 7d66cef Compare July 11, 2024 13:48
@SilvioC2C SilvioC2C force-pushed the 17.0-mig-connector_jira_servicedesk branch from 7d66cef to 79aa6b1 Compare July 17, 2024 14:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants