Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

imagemagick: move to openexr_3 #375163

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

LeSuisse
Copy link
Contributor

OpenEXR 2 is no maintained anymore.

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 25.05 Release Notes (or backporting 24.11 and 25.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

OpenEXR 2 is no maintained anymore.
@LeSuisse LeSuisse added the backport release-24.11 Backport PR automatically label Jan 19, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@yuyuyureka yuyuyureka left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Provided that it builds...

@emilazy
Copy link
Member

emilazy commented Jan 20, 2025

Should we be moving on #367406?

@wegank wegank added the 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one reputable person label Jan 20, 2025
@LeSuisse
Copy link
Contributor Author

Should we be moving on #367406?

Yeah, I kinda started to split it in multiple patches because it makes things easier to test and we cannot update openexr alias on stable. openexr_2 is still a bit too big to be tagged with knownVulnerabilities, it will break a bunch of things including pretty standard desktop environment.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
10.rebuild-darwin: 101-500 10.rebuild-linux: 101-500 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one reputable person backport release-24.11 Backport PR automatically
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants