haskellPackages: use upstream version for reflex-dom(-core)

[alexfmpe]

This fixes the reflex-dom-core build while we wait for the hackage release to propagate, but weird things happen with the deps of reflex-dom

these 6 derivations will be built:
  /nix/store/jnn0nhi5ddpjyc8mgvgggwg58lj9lg4p-gi-javascriptcore6-6.0.5.drv
  /nix/store/38ryddi3bsdq4zb3r8nf5lbg9qpmmvwg-gi-javascriptcore-6.0.5.drv
  /nix/store/66d98cgs16j2pgvv70413l09nkhlksc8-gi-javascriptcore4-4.0.29.drv
  /nix/store/ikd3398z8vfwz3796j86jxwcb5g500p3-gi-webkit2-4.0.32.drv
  /nix/store/bgkha8bxq60c1kns1kazhq61nz92wzqx-jsaddle-webkit2gtk-0.9.9.0.drv
  /nix/store/aj04snrxpcbsqgmxd9i60w141jhv6zya-reflex-dom-0.8.1.1.drv

jsaddle-webkit2gtk-0.9.9.0 -> gi-javascriptcore (>=4.0.14 && <4.1), gi-webkit2 (>=4.0.14 && <4.1)
gi-webkit2-4.0.31 -> gi-javascriptcore (>=4.0 && <4.1),
gi-webkit2-4.0.32 -> gi-javascriptcore4

It seems gi-webkit2 started using separate packages but jsaddle-webkit2gtk hasn't yet adjusted to the change?
IIUC until then we want to force jsaddle-webkit2gtk to use gi-javascriptcore4 ?

  jsaddle-webkit2gtk = super.jsaddle-webkit2gtk.override {
    gi-javascriptcore = self.gi-javascriptcore4;
  };

That simplifies things to

these 4 derivations will be built:
  /nix/store/66d98cgs16j2pgvv70413l09nkhlksc8-gi-javascriptcore4-4.0.29.drv
  /nix/store/ikd3398z8vfwz3796j86jxwcb5g500p3-gi-webkit2-4.0.32.drv
  /nix/store/51q2x4y18abxy8r994rai5wphmvmqcp4-jsaddle-webkit2gtk-0.9.9.0.drv
  /nix/store/z3mdc0jlclx0lcpamf01ya942ikfnkz2-reflex-dom-0.8.1.1.drv

but then gi-javascriptcore4 fails to build with

Using tar found on system at:
/nix/store/9cwwj1c9csmc85l2cqzs3h9hbf1vwl6c-gnutar-1.35/bin/tar
No uhc found
Error: Setup: Missing dependencies on foreign libraries:
* Missing (or bad) C libraries: javascriptcoregtk-4.0, gobject-2.0, glib-2.0
This problem can usually be solved by installing the system packages that
provide these libraries (you may need the "-dev" versions). If the libraries
are already installed but in a non-standard location then you can use the
flags --extra-include-dirs= and --extra-lib-dirs= to specify where they are.If
the library files do exist, it may contain errors that are caught by the C
compiler at the preprocessing stage. In this case you can re-run configure
with the verbosity flag -v3 to see the error messages.

and I can't seem to make it happy messing with *PkgconfigDepends

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 25.05 Release Notes (or backporting 24.11 and 25.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[sternenseemann]

Fix for gi-javascriptcore*: c2f080a

[alexfmpe]

$ nix-build -A haskellPackages.reflex-dom
/nix/store/ab8pq0lz0j2pc6mc40i905b1v19yy7k3-reflex-dom-0.6.3.2

$ nix-build -A pkgsCross.ghcjs.haskell.packages.ghc910.reflex-dom 
/nix/store/9g4zy7n8g55w45mccyy34vq754gl4hw1-reflex-dom-0.6.3.2

[sternenseemann]

Can you give the second reflex related commit a commit message with the <attr path>: … prefix as well?

I've already cherry picked f26afe0 onto haskell-updates.

[sternenseemann]

Needs to use lib.versionAtLeast instead, >= on strings is just a lexical comparison.

[alexfmpe]

Oh right

[sternenseemann]

Also needs lib.versionAtLeast.

[alexfmpe]

I've already cherry picked f26afe0 onto haskell-updates.

I think you meant 513b530 ?

[sternenseemann]

I think you meant 513b530 ?

Yes!

[sternenseemann]

Thanks! I've cherry-picked your commits manually and fixed your typo in 95d1770

[alexfmpe]

Hmm? Which typo?

[alexfmpe]

Oh, the commit message. Could have sworn I had fixed that on the latest force push