Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OWNERS: Change ownership of pkgs-lib #373558

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

infinisil
Copy link
Member

@infinisil infinisil commented Jan 13, 2025

I'd like to pass off maintainership of pkgs-lib and therefore pkgs.formats to others, so that I can focus on other things. There aren't a lot of PRs for that part of the code, but it adds up.

Here I'm proposing @Stunkymonkey and @h7x4 based on past engagement, let me know if you're okay with that!

Overall I recommend following the lib PR guidelines for maintenance. Note that:

  • The docs are easy to forget to update since they're far away from the code (ideally that would be improved).
  • Make sure that formats only have generate, type and optionally lib as defined in the docs.

And you're always welcome to ask me if you're unsure about something.


Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@github-actions github-actions bot added 6.topic: continuous integration Affects continuous integration (CI) in Nixpkgs, including Ofborg and GitHub Actions 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Linux labels Jan 13, 2025
@Stunkymonkey
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the proposal. I am happy to help.

@h7x4
Copy link
Member

h7x4 commented Jan 16, 2025

I'll happily join in :). I'm not as active at the moment, but I'll aim to be more responsive to pkgs-lib issues/PRs in particular. Maybe the next 3 lines can be removed as well

@infinisil infinisil force-pushed the change-pkgs-lib-ownership branch from f7e01c9 to df57e1c Compare January 16, 2025 14:43
@infinisil infinisil marked this pull request as ready for review January 16, 2025 14:43
@infinisil
Copy link
Member Author

infinisil commented Jan 16, 2025

@Stunkymonkey @h7x4 Thanks a lot! Feel free to merge :D

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
6.topic: continuous integration Affects continuous integration (CI) in Nixpkgs, including Ofborg and GitHub Actions 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Linux
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants