-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Backport release-24.11] nixpkgs-review: 2.12.0 -> 3.0.1 #373534
[Backport release-24.11] nixpkgs-review: 2.12.0 -> 3.0.1 #373534
Conversation
Diff: Mic92/nixpkgs-review@refs/tags/2.12.0...3.0.0 Changelog: https://github.com/Mic92/nixpkgs-review/releases/tag/3.0.0 (cherry picked from commit 170a250)
Diff: Mic92/nixpkgs-review@refs/tags/3.0.0...3.0.1 Changelog: https://github.com/Mic92/nixpkgs-review/releases/tag/3.0.1 (cherry picked from commit dc208d2)
Today I learnt: pressing enter while editing the title of a Github PR creates it, which happened before I changed the base branch. :) Good thing mass pings are a thing of the past. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for this, it's been a little annoying on my server 😆
nixpkgs-review
result
Generated using nixpkgs-review
.
Command: nixpkgs-review pr 373534
aarch64-linux
✅ 4 packages built:
- nix-update
- nix-update.dist
- nixpkgs-review
- nixpkgs-review.dist
x86_64-darwin
✅ 4 packages built:
- nix-update
- nix-update.dist
- nixpkgs-review
- nixpkgs-review.dist
aarch64-darwin
✅ 4 packages built:
- nix-update
- nix-update.dist
- nixpkgs-review
- nixpkgs-review.dist
Great thanks for backporting. I just hit the issue with ofborg cache . |
Backport of #366587 and #370816 (combined in one manual cherry-pick PR so we don't have two separate backport PRs).
Motivation: nixpkgs-review 2.x relies on the ofborg cache and at least for me does not fallback to local evaluation anymore when it does not find the cached ofborg evaluation, which is the case for all new nixpkgs PRs.
Discussion on Matrix.
This leaves 2.x in a somewhat broken state and can cause confusion for reviewers using stable. nixpkgs-review 3.x is required to fetch the evaluation cache of the new Github Actions evaluation.
@emilazy fittingly described it in a joking way: "nixpkgs-review is a live service game".
Things done
nix.conf
? (See Nix manual)sandbox = relaxed
sandbox = true
nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD"
. Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/
)Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.