-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GNOME staging updates 2024-12-31 #369753
GNOME staging updates 2024-12-31 #369753
Conversation
365b68e
to
3d3d863
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- Ran
sysprof
- Reviewed upstream changelogs.
- Successfully built each commit based on
nixos-unstable
with:
--- a/pkgs/development/tools/profiling/sysprof/capture.nix
+++ b/pkgs/development/tools/profiling/sysprof/capture.nix
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
{
stdenv,
lib,
+ fetchurl,
meson,
ninja,
sysprof,
@@ -8,8 +9,12 @@
stdenv.mkDerivation {
pname = "libsysprof-capture";
+ version = "47.0";
- inherit (sysprof) src version;
+ src = fetchurl {
+ url = "mirror://gnome/sources/sysprof/47/sysprof-47.0.tar.xz";
+ hash = "sha256-dCTGKUNGYGVCiMBCSJmMNX0c6H7hVZ/UTfGYCZLvXfU=";
+ };
nativeBuildInputs = [
meson
3d3d863
to
8e129ec
Compare
8e129ec
to
b4737eb
Compare
GNOME/[email protected] doesn't sound like "no changes" for me and the commit 1.55.5 tagged on is only on a branch "ci-test-release-3", did upstream clarify this release is actually a release? 😂 |
I assumed it was meant to test the new tarball deployment process. Either way, the individual commits still look fine to me. |
Successfully created backport PR for |
Things done
nix.conf
? (See Nix manual)sandbox = relaxed
sandbox = true
nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD"
. Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/
)Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.