postgresqlPackages.pg_net: 0.8.0 -> 0.11.0

[samrose]

Update pg_net to 0.11.0

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 24.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.11 and 24.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[samrose]

@NixOS/nixpkgs-merge-bot merge

[nixpkgs-merge-bot]

@samrose merge not permitted (#305350):
pkgs/servers/sql/postgresql/ext/pg_net.nix is not in pkgs/by-name/

[nixos-discourse]

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-ready-for-review/3032/4799

[wolfgangwalther]

@NixOS/nixpkgs-merge-bot merge

I don't think you can reasonably expect to be able to use this command, for which you need to be a maintainer already, while adding yourself as one in the same PR. Independent of whether that's already in by-name or not.

[wolfgangwalther]

Please add yourself as maintainer in a separate commit. See https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#commit-conventions.

[samrose]

done in de015f4

[khaneliman]

This is still in this commit and then you were just removed in a later commit.

[wolfgangwalther]

I don't think you can reasonably expect to be able to use this command, for which you need to be a maintainer already, while adding yourself as one in the same PR.

That being said, it's kind of odd that ofborg adds the 11.by: package-maintainer label...

[wolfgangwalther]

Also note the commit messages should start with postgresqlPackages.pg_net: ....

[samrose]

@NixOS/nixpkgs-merge-bot merge

I don't think you can reasonably expect to be able to use this command, for which you need to be a maintainer already, while adding yourself as one in the same PR. Independent of whether that's already in by-name or not.

Thanks for that info. It's been some time since I have put through PR into nixpkgs, and it wasn't clear from contributing docs what various permissions are needed for these actions. But that makes sense and thank you for the clarification.

[wolfgangwalther]

Right now you have 4 commits, but we can't merge like that. Please rebase your branch, so that you have three commits:

• postgresqlPackages.pg_net: 0.8.0 -> 0.11.0
• postgresqlPackages.pg_net: add samrose as maintainer (note it's fine to add yourself in this PR, I just meant it to be a separate commit)
• postgresqlPackages.pg_net: nixfmt

Please also change the PR title accordingly (with the postgreslPackages prefix). I wasn't able to find this PR when just searching for "postgresql" the first time, it didn't show up. Also some of the CI depends on the commits' prefixes, IIRC.

[Ma27]

Except for @wolfgangwalther's remarks the change looks good to me, thanks!

[wolfgangwalther]

This now needs a rebase to solve the expected conflicts after #344039 has reached master.

[wolfgangwalther]

ftr: I added the update of pg_net to #356283.