nanomq: 0.20.8 → 0.22.1

[risicle]

Description of changes

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-25767
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-31040
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-31041
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-31036

Replacement for #284345. Turns out even if I hack a version of paho-mqtt 2.x into the PYTHONPATH here, the websocket tests still fail. So, omit them because we can't continue shipping a package with these vulnerabilities. Unless we're going to just leave it and mark with knownVulnerabilities, which is also an option.

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 24.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.11 and 24.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[smancill]

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 325328 run on x86_64-darwin 1

1 package built:

• nanomq

[smancill]

@ofborg build nanomq

[vcunat]

nanomq.tests were broken before this PR already, but the error message changed 😕

[smancill]

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 325328 run on x86_64-darwin 1

1 package built:

• nanomq

The installCheckPhase does fail though, with the same interruption error than in Linux.

[smancill]

Also, I noticed this:

nanomq>           ************************************************************
nanomq>           Linking against Mbed TLS may change license terms.
nanomq>           Consult a lawyer and the license files for details.
nanomq>           ************************************************************