ceptre: move to by-name; add license field; cleanup; update to 0-unstable-2024-8-26

[NotAShelf]

Description of changes

Cleans up derivation for Ceptre, adds license, formats via nixfmt-rfc-style and
updates to the latest untagged commit: 0-unstable-2023-12-12

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See
  Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s)
    (look inside
    nixos/tests)
  • and/or
    package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in
    lib/tests or
    pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are
    linked
    to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using
  nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all
  changes have to be committed, also see
  nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in
  ./result/bin/)
• 24.11 Release Notes
  (or backporting
  23.11
  and
  24.05
  Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or
    breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is
    significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS
    module
• Fits
  CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[Frontear]

Is it possible that rev bumping of this can be automated via a passthru.updateScript { }? Would be great so that it doesn't require manual bumping, especially if its a simple drv

[Frontear]

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 325113 run on x86_64-linux 1

1 package built:

• ceptre

[NotAShelf]

Is it possible that rev bumping of this can be automated via a passthru.updateScript { }? Would be great so that it doesn't require manual bumping, especially if its a simple drv

You mean to undo updating, let the update bot handle it?

[Frontear]

Is it possible that rev bumping of this can be automated via a passthru.updateScript { }? Would be great so that it doesn't require manual bumping, especially if its a simple drv

You mean to undo updating, let the update bot handle it?

No no, this PR is great and should get merged. My comment meant moreso that in this PR, as part of the cleanup, maybe we can add an updateScript, assuming its possible

[NotAShelf]

It should be easy to do, I'll handle that tomorrow.

[SuperSandro2000]

Please rebase

[NotAShelf]

I had missed that, done.

[NotAShelf]

Formatting is fixed too now.

[Pandapip1]

Merge conflict due to #354531.

[NotAShelf]

That was... unexpected. I'll try to fix it tomorrow.

[NotAShelf]

Okay that was faster than I thought. @Pandapip1 I hope this is satisfactory?

[Pandapip1]

LGTM

[niklaskorz]

nixpkgs-review result

Generated using nixpkgs-review.

Command: nixpkgs-review pr 325113

---

aarch64-darwin

✅ 1 package built:

• ceptre

[nixos-discourse]

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-already-reviewed/2617/2182