Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

python311Packages.paho-mqtt: 1.6.1 -> 2.0.0 #288219

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

dotlambda
Copy link
Member

Description of changes

Diff: eclipse-paho/paho.mqtt.python@v1.6.1...v2.0.0

Changelog: https://github.com/eclipse/paho.mqtt.python/blob/v2.0.0/ChangeLog.txt

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 24.05 Release Notes (or backporting 23.05 and 23.11 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@ofborg ofborg bot requested review from mweinelt, fabaff and Mic92 April 21, 2024 02:02
@risicle risicle mentioned this pull request May 10, 2024
13 tasks
preCheck = ''
ln -s ${testing} paho.mqtt.testing

export PYTHONPATH=".:$PYTHONPATH"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hold on, isn't this going to cause it to pick up the copy of paho-mqtt in the source directory instead of the installed copy?

@wegank wegank added the 2.status: merge conflict This PR has merge conflicts with the target branch label May 22, 2024
@mweinelt
Copy link
Member

mweinelt commented Jul 7, 2024

Superseded by #325122

@mweinelt mweinelt closed this Jul 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
2.status: merge conflict This PR has merge conflicts with the target branch 6.topic: python 10.rebuild-darwin: 11-100 10.rebuild-linux: 501-1000 10.rebuild-linux: 501+ 11.by: package-maintainer This PR was created by the maintainer of the package it changes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants