Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OPTIMADE JSON Lines specification appendix #531

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ml-evs
Copy link
Member

@ml-evs ml-evs commented Jul 19, 2024

This PR begins the work on #471, by defining the conventions on top of JSON Lines for deserializing an entire OPTIMADE API into a file.

optimade.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
optimade.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
optimade.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
optimade.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
optimade.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
optimade.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
optimade.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@ml-evs ml-evs changed the title [WIP] OPTIMADE JSON Lines specification appendix OPTIMADE JSON Lines specification appendix Jul 29, 2024
Fix code block formatting

Update optimade.rst

Apply suggestions from code review

Apply suggestions from code review

Try to fix formatting again

Fix formatting and add note about provider fields
@ml-evs ml-evs force-pushed the ml-evs/jsonlines-draft branch from 6929f10 to c5f1f53 Compare July 29, 2024 20:51
@ml-evs ml-evs force-pushed the ml-evs/jsonlines-draft branch from 96b0231 to 78e158c Compare July 29, 2024 21:09
@ml-evs ml-evs marked this pull request as ready for review July 30, 2024 16:55
@ml-evs ml-evs requested a review from eimrek July 30, 2024 16:55
Copy link
Member

@eimrek eimrek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @ml-evs, and sorry for the delays. Now had some time to take a look. I like the proposal and it can be used for optimade-maker as well. But I wrote some comments for consideration.

optimade.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
optimade.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
optimade.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
optimade.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
optimade.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
optimade.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
optimade.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
optimade.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@ml-evs
Copy link
Member Author

ml-evs commented Jan 23, 2025

CI is blocked by #536, but perhaps you could take another look when you get a chance @eimrek? I'll invite some other reviewers too.

@ml-evs ml-evs requested review from eimrek, rartino and merkys January 23, 2025 18:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants