catalog: Remove usages of term Stash #23532
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This commit removes usages of the term Stash from comments, logs, strings, and variable names and replaces it with something more generic like "catalog" or "catalog storage". We are working on replacing the Stash as the backing durable store for the catalog with persist, which will make these usages inaccurate. Works towards resolving #22392
def-
approved these changes
Nov 29, 2023
nrainer-materialize
approved these changes
Nov 29, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This commit removes usages of the term Stash from comments, logs, strings, and variable names and replaces it with something more generic like "catalog" or "catalog storage". We are working on replacing the Stash as the backing durable store for the catalog with persist, which will make these usages inaccurate.
Works towards resolving MaterializeInc/database-issues#6762
Motivation
This PR refactors existing code.
Checklist
$T ⇔ Proto$Tmapping (possibly in a backwards-incompatible way), then it is tagged with aT-protolabel.