Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

protobuf rename bin record -> period record #1084

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 9, 2025
Merged

Conversation

hopeyen
Copy link
Contributor

@hopeyen hopeyen commented Jan 8, 2025

Why are these changes needed?

Some leftover legacy names

Checks

  • I've made sure the tests are passing. Note that there might be a few flaky tests, in that case, please comment that they are not relevant.
  • I've checked the new test coverage and the coverage percentage didn't drop.
  • Testing Strategy
    • Unit tests
    • Integration tests
    • This PR is not tested :(

@hopeyen hopeyen force-pushed the hope/rename-bin-record branch from 1d3d7e8 to b367b9e Compare January 8, 2025 16:27
@hopeyen hopeyen force-pushed the hope/rename-bin-record branch from 4c176f8 to c7c538e Compare January 8, 2025 19:34
@hopeyen hopeyen changed the title rename bin record protobuf rename bin record -> period record Jan 8, 2025
@@ -43,9 +43,9 @@ func NewAccountant(accountID string, reservation *core.ReservedPayment, onDemand
//TODO: client storage; currently every instance starts fresh but on-chain or a small store makes more sense
// Also client is currently responsible for supplying network params, we need to add RPC in order to be automatic
// There's a subsequent PR that handles populating the accountant with on-chain state from the disperser
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Has this been addressed?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yep. comments removed

@hopeyen hopeyen merged commit 99792bf into master Jan 9, 2025
9 checks passed
@hopeyen hopeyen deleted the hope/rename-bin-record branch January 9, 2025 18:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants