Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Provide examples to extend supported provisioners' test coverage #140

Open
fabiobrz opened this issue Feb 2, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
Assignees
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@fabiobrz
Copy link
Member

fabiobrz commented Feb 2, 2024

There should be an example available for each supported provisioner implementation, that a user can easily reach via links available in the provisioners documentation - see #139 - and understand the relevant application descriptor and configuration details.

Is related to #139

  • Environment: documentation/examples
  • Steps to reproduce: N/A
@fabiobrz fabiobrz added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request labels Feb 2, 2024
@fabiobrz fabiobrz added this to the IM2 - WIP milestone Feb 2, 2024
@fabiobrz fabiobrz moved this to Todo in Intersmash library Feb 2, 2024
@fabiobrz fabiobrz changed the title Provide examples to cover each provisioner Provide examples to extend supported provisioners' test covcerage Mar 4, 2024
@fabiobrz fabiobrz changed the title Provide examples to extend supported provisioners' test covcerage Provide examples to extend supported provisioners' test coverage Mar 4, 2024
@fabiobrz fabiobrz self-assigned this Mar 11, 2024
@fabiobrz fabiobrz moved this from Todo to In Progress in Intersmash library Apr 10, 2024
@fabiobrz fabiobrz moved this from In Progress to Todo in Intersmash library Apr 29, 2024
@dosubot dosubot bot added the stale Issue has not had recent activity or appears to be solved. Stale issues will be automatically closed label Sep 19, 2024
@fabiobrz fabiobrz removed nice-to-have stale Issue has not had recent activity or appears to be solved. Stale issues will be automatically closed labels Sep 20, 2024
Copy link

dosubot bot commented Dec 20, 2024

Hi, @fabiobrz. I'm Dosu, and I'm helping the intersmash team manage their backlog. I'm marking this issue as stale.

Issue Summary:

  • You requested examples for each supported provisioner implementation in the documentation.
  • The goal is to enhance user understanding of the application descriptor and configuration details.
  • This issue is related to issue Improve documentation (provisioners, testsuite) #139 and aims to improve documentation and test coverage.
  • There have been no comments or additional activity on this issue.

Next Steps:

  • Please let me know if this issue is still relevant to the latest version of the intersmash repository by commenting here.
  • If there is no further activity, the issue will be automatically closed in 30 days.

Thank you for your understanding and contribution!

@dosubot dosubot bot added the stale Issue has not had recent activity or appears to be solved. Stale issues will be automatically closed label Dec 20, 2024
@fabiobrz fabiobrz removed the stale Issue has not had recent activity or appears to be solved. Stale issues will be automatically closed label Jan 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant