-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 85
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
use mold in nix environments #1564
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
7694771
to
9d4bcc7
Compare
mkShell (rustEnvVars // { | ||
buildInputs = [ | ||
# Rust dependencies | ||
stdenv = |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is stdenv
meant to be passed to mkShell
?
I get compilation errors on NixOS currently (and also if i pass stdenv
to mkShell
).
= note: gcc: error: unrecognized command-line option '-fuse-ld=/nix/store/b7hb6xpazdnidp0s87fain2im6lk4f4r-mold-2.30.0/bin/mold'
So it looks like the devShell still brings in gcc and that's used for compilation.
I can compile with this change
diff --git a/flake.nix b/flake.nix
index 66d29e7a..7e0872a5 100644
--- a/flake.nix
+++ b/flake.nix
@@ -205,7 +205,8 @@
jq
] ++ lib.optionals moldLinker [ mold ];
in
- mkShell (rustEnvVars // {
+ stdenv.mkDerivation (rustEnvVars // {
+ name = "shell";
buildInputs = [
stableToolchain
However linking still seems fairly slow. What kind of speedup do you get?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is
stdenv
meant to be passed tomkShell
?I get compilation errors on NixOS currently (and also if i pass
stdenv
tomkShell
).= note: gcc: error: unrecognized command-line option '-fuse-ld=/nix/store/b7hb6xpazdnidp0s87fain2im6lk4f4r-mold-2.30.0/bin/mold'
Sorry my nix skills are very thin, so I'm probably doing something wrong. The gcc
error is the same that caused me to add the env var. I'm unsure what configuration is causing gcc
to be selected in some cases and not others. Possibly the issue is related to the gcc version.
So it looks like the devShell still brings in gcc and that's used for compilation.
However linking still seems fairly slow. What kind of speedup do you get?
It is noticeably faster for me. It isn't very straightforward to get real figures, because the biggest speedups are on incremental changes and modifying RUSTFLAGS
will trigger a recompile of many things.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What I think works quite well and is somewhat realistic for development is to run a full build, then touch sequencer/src/lib.rs
and then run the build again and time it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
#!/usr/bin/env bash
function build() {
echo "building..."
cargo clippy --all-features
}
build
touch sequencer/src/lib.rs
echo "timing re-build ..."
time build
I tried with this script and for both the new shell and the old shell I get 4-5 seconds real
time.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the linker is actually not invoked when running cargo clippy. If I make this change
diff --git a/flake.nix b/flake.nix
index 66d29e7a..5015ff00 100644
--- a/flake.nix
+++ b/flake.nix
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
ASYNC_FLAGS = " --cfg async_executor_impl=\"async-std\" --cfg async_channel_impl=\"async-std\" ";
LINKER_FLAGS =
if moldLinker then
- "-C link-arg=-fuse-ld=${pkgs.mold}/bin/mold"
+ "-C link-arg=-fuse-ld=${pkgs.mold}/bin/mold-blah"
else
""
;
things still work.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also the shell still doesn't seem to be using mold
for linking in my case 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
maybe you can confirm like so:
readelf -p .comment target/debug/sequencer
String dump of section '.comment':
[ 0] **mold** 2.31.0 (20fa8d56f5e0c47d1f4bbf7b829c12d3f43298e1; compatible with GNU ld)
[ 4f] rustc version 1.78.0 (9b00956e5 2024-04-29)
[ 7b] GCC: (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the linker is actually not invoked when running cargo clippy. If I make this change
Cargo clippy evokes rustc
w/ linker arguments... I think some linking would have to go on since you are compiling a new binary... but I'm really not clear on the internals.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe if you want to get a better idea if it mold is useful for you, start by removing nix from the equation. Then we can figure out how to fix my terrible nix code :/.
Install mold into nix environment and configure rust to use it.