-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 638
.pr_agent_auto_best_practices
Pattern 1: Emphasize error handling and input validation to prevent runtime errors and improve code robustness, particularly for null values, file operations, and API responses
Example code before:
def process_data(response):
return response.strip()
Example code after:
def process_data(response):
if not response:
return ""
return response.strip()
Relevant past accepted suggestions:
Suggestion 1:
Add null-safety checks to prevent potential runtime errors when handling string operations
Consider handling empty strings and None values explicitly before applying string operations to prevent potential AttributeError exceptions.
pr_agent/algo/utils.py [591-592]
-original_file_content_str = original_file_content_str.rstrip() + "\n"
-new_file_content_str = new_file_content_str.rstrip() + "\n"
+original_file_content_str = (original_file_content_str or "").rstrip() + "\n"
+new_file_content_str = (new_file_content_str or "").rstrip() + "\n"Suggestion 2:
Add null check before string operations to prevent potential runtime errors
Add error handling for the case when response is empty or None before attempting string operations. The current implementation could raise AttributeError if response is None.
pr_agent/tools/pr_update_changelog.py [115-117]
+if not response:
+ return ""
response = response.strip()
if response.startswith("```"):
response_lines = response.splitlines()Suggestion 3:
Add graceful fallback when configuration settings are missing
Add error handling for the case when the model configuration is missing. Currently, if the config doesn't have the required model setting, it will raise an unhandled attribute error.
pr_agent/algo/pr_processing.py [357-360]
if model_type == ModelType.WEAK:
- model = get_settings().config.model_week
+ model = getattr(get_settings().config, 'model_week', get_settings().config.model)
else:
model = get_settings().config.modelSuggestion 4:
Add error handling for file operations to improve robustness
Consider adding error handling when opening and reading files to gracefully handle potential IOErrors or other exceptions that may occur during file operations.
pr_agent/tools/pr_help_message.py [102-105]
for file in md_files:
- with open(file, 'r') as f:
- file_path = str(file).replace(str(docs_path), '')
- docs_prompt += f"==file name:==\n\n{file_path}\n\n==file content:==\n\n{f.read().strip()}\n=========\n\n"
+ try:
+ with open(file, 'r') as f:
+ file_path = str(file).relative_to(docs_path)
+ docs_prompt += f"==file name:==\n\n{file_path}\n\n==file content:==\n\n{f.read().strip()}\n=========\n\n"
+ except IOError as e:
+ get_logger().error(f"Error reading file {file}: {e}")Suggestion 5:
Add input validation to prevent potential runtime errors caused by invalid input
Consider adding input validation for the repo_path parameter to ensure it's not empty or None before using it in the f-string, preventing potential runtime errors.
pr_agent/tools/ticket_pr_compliance_check.py [53-54]
-if issue_number.isdigit() and len(issue_number) < 5:
+if issue_number.isdigit() and len(issue_number) < 5 and repo_path:
github_tickets.add(f'https://github.com/{repo_path}/issues/{issue_number}')Pattern 2: Use appropriate data structures and algorithms to improve performance and maintainability (e.g., sets vs lists, regex compilation, process pools)
Example code before:
excluded_files = ['file1.txt', 'file2.txt']
if filename in excluded_files:
Example code after:
excluded_files = {'file1.txt', 'file2.txt'}
if filename in excluded_files:
Relevant past accepted suggestions:
Suggestion 1:
Use a set for faster lookup of excluded files
Consider using a set instead of a list for files_to_exclude to improve lookup performance, especially if the list of excluded files grows larger.
pr_agent/tools/pr_help_message.py [90]
-files_to_exclude = ['EXAMPLE_BEST_PRACTICE.md', 'compression_strategy.md', '/docs/overview/index.md']
+files_to_exclude = {'EXAMPLE_BEST_PRACTICE.md', 'compression_strategy.md', '/docs/overview/index.md'}Suggestion 2:
Compile regex patterns outside the function to improve performance for repeated calls
Move the regex pattern compilation outside the function to improve performance, especially if this function is called multiple times.
pr_agent/tools/ticket_pr_compliance_check.py [31-40]
+# Compile the regex pattern once, outside the function
+GITHUB_TICKET_PATTERN = re.compile(r'(https://github[^/]+/[^/]+/[^/]+/issues/\d+)|(\b(\w+)/(\w+)#(\d+)\b)')
+
def extract_ticket_links_from_pr_description(pr_description, repo_path):
"""
Extract all ticket links from PR description
"""
github_tickets = []
try:
- # Pattern to match full GitHub issue URLs and shorthand notations like owner/repo#issue_number or https://github.com/owner/repo/issues/issue_number
- pattern = r'(https://github[^/]+/[^/]+/[^/]+/issues/\d+)|(\b(\w+)/(\w+)#(\d+)\b)'
+ matches = GITHUB_TICKET_PATTERN.findall(pr_description)
- matches = re.findall(pattern, pr_description)
-Suggestion 3:
Use a process pool to manage concurrent tasks more efficiently
Instead of creating a new process for each task in the queue, consider using a process pool to reuse processes and limit the number of concurrent processes. This can help manage system resources more efficiently, especially when dealing with a high volume of notifications.
pr_agent/servers/github_polling.py [202-207]
-processes = []
-for func, args in task_queue: # Create parallel tasks
- p = multiprocessing.Process(target=func, args=args)
- processes.append(p)
- p.start()
-task_queue.clear()
+with multiprocessing.Pool(processes=4) as pool: # Adjust the number of processes as needed
+ results = [pool.apply_async(func, args) for func, args in task_queue]
+ task_queue.clear()
+ # Optionally, you can wait for all tasks to complete:
+ # for result in results:
+ # result.get()
Suggestion 4:
Refactor the mock method to use a dictionary for improved efficiency and maintainability
Consider using a more efficient data structure, such as a dictionary, for the mock_get_content_of_file method. This would improve the readability and maintainability of the code, especially as the number of test cases grows.
tests/unittest/test_bitbucket_provider.py [25-40]
def mock_get_content_of_file(self, project_key, repository_slug, filename, at=None, markup=None):
- if at == '9c1cffdd9f276074bfb6fb3b70fbee62d298b058':
- return 'file\nwith\nsome\nlines\nto\nemulate\na\nreal\nfile\n'
- elif at == '2a1165446bdf991caf114d01f7c88d84ae7399cf':
- return 'file\nwith\nmultiple \nlines\nto\nemulate\na\nfake\nfile\n'
- elif at == 'f617708826cdd0b40abb5245eda71630192a17e3':
- return 'file\nwith\nmultiple \nlines\nto\nemulate\na\nreal\nfile\n'
- elif at == 'cb68a3027d6dda065a7692ebf2c90bed1bcdec28':
- return 'file\nwith\nsome\nchanges\nto\nemulate\na\nreal\nfile\n'
- elif at == '1905dcf16c0aac6ac24f7ab617ad09c73dc1d23b':
- return 'file\nwith\nsome\nlines\nto\nemulate\na\nfake\ntest\n'
- elif at == 'ae4eca7f222c96d396927d48ab7538e2ee13ca63':
- return 'readme\nwithout\nsome\nlines\nto\nsimulate\na\nreal\nfile'
- elif at == '548f8ba15abc30875a082156314426806c3f4d97':
- return 'file\nwith\nsome\nlines\nto\nemulate\na\nreal\nfile'
- return ''
+ content_map = {
+ '9c1cffdd9f276074bfb6fb3b70fbee62d298b058': 'file\nwith\nsome\nlines\nto\nemulate\na\nreal\nfile\n',
+ '2a1165446bdf991caf114d01f7c88d84ae7399cf': 'file\nwith\nmultiple \nlines\nto\nemulate\na\nfake\nfile\n',
+ 'f617708826cdd0b40abb5245eda71630192a17e3': 'file\nwith\nmultiple \nlines\nto\nemulate\na\nreal\nfile\n',
+ 'cb68a3027d6dda065a7692ebf2c90bed1bcdec28': 'file\nwith\nsome\nchanges\nto\nemulate\na\nreal\nfile\n',
+ '1905dcf16c0aac6ac24f7ab617ad09c73dc1d23b': 'file\nwith\nsome\nlines\nto\nemulate\na\nfake\ntest\n',
+ 'ae4eca7f222c96d396927d48ab7538e2ee13ca63': 'readme\nwithout\nsome\nlines\nto\nsimulate\na\nreal\nfile',
+ '548f8ba15abc30875a082156314426806c3f4d97': 'file\nwith\nsome\nlines\nto\nemulate\na\nreal\nfile'
+ }
+ return content_map.get(at, '')
Pattern 3: Improve documentation clarity, accessibility and security warnings through better organization, proper formatting, and explicit security guidance
Example code before:
# Configuration
Add your API key to config.env
Example code after:
# Configuration
Add your API key to config.env
⚠️ WARNING: Never commit config.env to version control
Relevant past accepted suggestions:
Suggestion 1:
Add security warning about protecting sensitive credentials in environment files
Add a security warning about not committing the .env file to version control, and recommend adding it to .gitignore to prevent accidental exposure of sensitive credentials.
docs/docs/installation/locally.md [77-84]
You can define the environment variables in a plain text file named `.env` with the following content:
CONFIG__GIT_PROVIDER="gitlab" GITLAB__URL="" GITLAB__PERSONAL_ACCESS_TOKEN="" OPENAI__KEY=""
+> ⚠️ **Security Warning**: Never commit the `.env` file to version control as it contains sensitive credentials. Add `.env` to your `.gitignore` file to prevent accidental exposure.
+
Suggestion 2:
Organize blog links into categories for improved navigation and readability
Consider grouping the blog links into categories based on their topics. This will help readers quickly find articles related to specific areas of interest, such as code generation, development processes, or cost optimization.
docs/docs/core-abilities/index.md [14-24]
## Blogs
Here are some additional technical blogs from Qodo, that delve deeper into the core capabilities and features of Large Language Models (LLMs) when applied to coding tasks.
These resources provide more comprehensive insights into leveraging LLMs for software development.
+### Code Generation and LLMs
+- [State-of-the-art Code Generation with AlphaCodium – From Prompt Engineering to Flow Engineering](https://www.qodo.ai/blog/qodoflow-state-of-the-art-code-generation-for-code-contests/)
+- [RAG for a Codebase with 10k Repos](https://www.qodo.ai/blog/rag-for-large-scale-code-repos/)
-- [State-of-the-art Code Generation with AlphaCodium – From Prompt Engineering to Flow Engineering](https://www.qodo.ai/blog/qodoflow-state-of-the-art-code-generation-for-code-contests/)
+### Development Processes
- [Understanding the Challenges and Pain Points of the Pull Request Cycle](https://www.qodo.ai/blog/understanding-the-challenges-and-pain-points-of-the-pull-request-cycle/)
-- [RAG for a Codebase with 10k Repos](https://www.qodo.ai/blog/rag-for-large-scale-code-repos/)
- [Introduction to Code Coverage Testing](https://www.qodo.ai/blog/introduction-to-code-coverage-testing/)
+
+### Cost Optimization
- [Reduce Your Costs by 30% When Using GPT for Python Code](https://www.qodo.ai/blog/reduce-your-costs-by-30-when-using-gpt-3-for-python-code/)Suggestion 3:
Correct image URLs and add alt text for better accessibility
The image URLs for the statistics screenshots appear to have a duplicate ".png" extension. Consider removing the extra extension to ensure the images load correctly.
docs/docs/tools/improve.md [67-69]
-{width=384}
+{width=384 alt="Statistics on code suggestions impact - part 1"}
-{width=384}
+{width=384 alt="Statistics on code suggestions impact - part 2"}
Suggestion 4:
Expand on the security and privacy aspects of the PR-Chat feature
Consider adding more details about the security and privacy aspects of the PR-Chat feature. This will help address potential concerns users might have about using the tool.
docs/docs/chrome-extension/index.md [19-20]
-The Chrome extension will not send any code to the server.
-To access code from private repositories, we will first validate the user's identity and permissions, then generate responses using the existing PR-Agent Pro integration.
+### Security and Privacy
+We take your code's security and privacy seriously:
+
+- The Chrome extension does not send any code to external servers.
+- For private repositories, we use secure authentication to validate the user's identity and permissions.
+- Responses are generated using the existing PR-Agent Pro integration, ensuring your code stays within your trusted environment.
+- All communication is encrypted and follows best practices for data protection.
+
+For more details on our security measures, please refer to our [Security Policy](link-to-security-policy).
+Pattern 4: Extract repeated code into functions/constants and use descriptive names to improve maintainability and readability
Example code before:
if draft and skip_draft:
logger.info("Skipping draft PR")
return success_response
Example code after:
def should_skip_draft_pr(draft: bool) -> bool:
return draft and get_settings().skip_draft_prs
Relevant past accepted suggestions:
Suggestion 1:
Extract draft MR skipping logic into a separate function to improve code organization
Consider extracting the logic for checking if a merge request is a draft and should be skipped into a separate function. This will improve code readability and reduce duplication.
pr_agent/servers/gitlab_webhook.py [133-135]
-if draft and skip_draft_mr:
- get_logger().info(f"Skipping draft MR: {url}")
- return JSONResponse(status_code=status.HTTP_200_OK, content=jsonable_encoder({"message": "success"}))
+if should_skip_draft_mr(draft, skip_draft_mr, url):
+ return SUCCESS_RESPONSE
Suggestion 2:
Use a constant for repeated success responses to improve code maintainability
Consider using a constant for the 'success' message to avoid repetition and improve maintainability. Define a constant at the module level and use it in all return statements.
pr_agent/servers/gitlab_webhook.py [124]
-return JSONResponse(status_code=status.HTTP_200_OK, content=jsonable_encoder({"message": "success"}))
+return SUCCESS_RESPONSE
Suggestion 3:
Extract repeated code into a separate function to reduce duplication
Consider extracting the repeated JSONResponse creation into a separate function to reduce code duplication and improve maintainability.
pr_agent/servers/gitlab_webhook.py [139-143]
+def create_success_response():
+ return JSONResponse(status_code=status.HTTP_200_OK, content=jsonable_encoder({"message": "success"}))
+
if should_skip_mr(draft, url):
- return JSONResponse(status_code=status.HTTP_200_OK, content=jsonable_encoder({"message": "success"}))
+ return create_success_response()
get_logger().info(f"New merge request: {url}")
await _perform_commands_gitlab("pr_commands", PRAgent(), url, log_context)
Suggestion 4:
Rename configuration option for clarity
Consider using a more specific name for the skip_types configuration option to better reflect its purpose in the context of patch extension.
pr_agent/settings/configuration.toml [23]
-skip_types =[".md",".txt"]
+patch_extension_skip_types = [".md", ".txt"]
Pattern 5: Fix broken links and incorrect references in documentation to ensure proper navigation and user experience
Example code before:
[Setup Guide](./setup.md)
[API Reference](./implement.md)
Example code after:
[Setup Guide](./setup.md)
[API Reference](./api-reference.md)
Relevant past accepted suggestions:
Suggestion 1:
Fix incorrect documentation link that could lead users to wrong resource
💎 Test (/test) | generate tests for a selected component, based on the PR code changes |
+| 💎 Test (/test) | generate tests for a selected component, based on the PR code changes |
**The link in the Test tool entry is incorrect - it points to 'implement.md' instead of 'test.md'. This could confuse users trying to access the test documentation.**
[docs/docs/tools/index.md [17]](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/pull/1417/files#diff-b3166060d77806092068e98904c634685a3d382b36aef22cf86f505efd280c79R17-R17)
```diff
-| **💎 [Test (`/test`](./implement.md))** | generate tests for a selected component, based on the PR code changes |
+| **💎 [Test (`/test`](./test.md))** | generate tests for a selected component, based on the PR code changes |
Suggestion 2:
Fix broken documentation link that points to an inaccessible edit URL
The tagging bot link points to an edit URL which is not publicly accessible. Update it to point to the correct documentation or section.
-| | [Tagging bot](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/edit/main/README.md#try-it-now) | ✅ | | | |
+| | [Tagging bot](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent#try-it-now) | ✅ | | | |Suggestion 3:
Correct image URLs and add alt text for better accessibility
The image URLs for the statistics screenshots appear to have a duplicate ".png" extension. Consider removing the extra extension to ensure the images load correctly.
docs/docs/tools/improve.md [67-69]
-{width=384}
+{width=384 alt="Statistics on code suggestions impact - part 1"}
-{width=384}
+{width=384 alt="Statistics on code suggestions impact - part 2"}